OKLO

Prezzo OKLO Inc

Closed
OKLO
$46,59
-$2,17(-4,45%)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-08 00:42 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-08 00:42, OKLO Inc (OKLO) is priced at $46,59, with a total market cap of $8,08B, a P/E ratio of -99,39, and a dividend yield of 0,00%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $44,91 and $47,92. The current price is 3,74% above the day's low and 2,77% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 6,32M. Over the past 52 weeks, OKLO has traded between $44,91 to $51,84, and the current price is -10,12% away from the 52-week high.

OKLO Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$48,76
Market Cap$8,08B
Volume6,32M
P/E Ratio-99,39
Dividend Yield (TTM)0,00%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0,73
Net Income (FY)-$105,66M
Revenue (FY)$0,00
Earnings Date2026-05-12
EPS Estimate0,20
Revenue Estimate$0,00
Shares Outstanding165,84M
Beta (1Y)0.943

About OKLO

Oklo Inc. designs and develops fission power plants to provide reliable and commercial-scale energy to customers in the United States. It also provides used nuclear fuel recycling services. The company was founded in 2013 and is based in Santa Clara, California.
SectorUtilities
IndustryRegulated Electric
CEOJacob Dewitte
HeadquartersSanta Clara,CA,US
Official Websitehttps://www.oklo.com
Employees (FY)205,00

OKLO Inc (OKLO) FAQ

What's the stock price of OKLO Inc (OKLO) today?

x
OKLO Inc (OKLO) is currently trading at $46,59, with a 24h change of -4,45%. The 52-week trading range is $44,91–$51,84.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for OKLO Inc (OKLO)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of OKLO Inc (OKLO)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of OKLO Inc (OKLO)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for OKLO Inc (OKLO)?

x

Should you buy or sell OKLO Inc (OKLO) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of OKLO Inc (OKLO)?

x

How to buy OKLO Inc (OKLO) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Hot Posts su OKLO Inc (OKLO)

tx_pending_forever

tx_pending_forever

1 ore fa
So last week was pretty wild if you were paying attention to the AI space. NVIDIA's earnings call basically confirmed what everyone wanted to hear - the Grace Blackwell ramp is happening faster than expected. But here's what stuck with me more: Jensen spent most of his opening remarks drilling into the China export control situation. That's the kind of macro risk that doesn't get enough airtime. The other thing that caught my eye was Anthropic's Dario Amodei saying barely anyone's talking about the job disruption coming for white collar workers. Entry-level knowledge work is about to get weird. Meanwhile, I noticed something about how these companies training massive language models are basically running out of training data. Google dropping $60M for exclusive Reddit access makes way more sense now - millions of real conversations and product discussions. That's gold for LLM training. Here's what's actually fascinating though: the real bottleneck isn't just data anymore, it's compute and energy. NVIDIA's building out Omniverse and Cosmos specifically so companies can generate synthetic training data at scale. Billions of iterations in hours instead of months. When you think about it that way, the robotics angle becomes clearer. Figure and the other humanoid companies aren't just building robots - they're building systems that need massive amounts of synthetic world data to train on. Which brings me to the energy piece. Nobody's really connecting the dots that datacenter buildout is creating insane demand for new power sources. That's why the nuclear play got so hot last week. After Trump's executive orders on reactor permitting and uranium production, you saw LEU jump 18%, SMR spike 25%, and OKLO absolutely soar 29.5%. These stocks are trading at crazy valuations right now - like 100X sales on some of them - but the underlying thesis is solid. The country needs at least 50 new small modular reactors in the next decade just to power the AI infrastructure. So if you're looking at tech stocks to buy now, you've got multiple angles. The obvious play is still robotics and AI - I've been recommending BOTZ as an easy entry point since NVIDIA's the largest holding and it gives you exposure to Figure and the other serious competitors coming up. But the less obvious play is the nuclear infrastructure piece. NUKZ is worth grabbing as a lower-risk way to track the SMR companies without picking individual names that are this frothy. The bigger picture is that this AI infrastructure race has three layers: the chips (NVIDIA obviously), the robots that run on those chips, and the power infrastructure to run everything. Most people are only looking at layer one. Tech stocks to buy now need to account for all three. That's why I'm watching both the robotics ETF and the nuclear ETF - they're not sexy individual picks, but they're how you actually position for the next decade of AI buildout. One thing I missed was how connected some of these dots were. Chris Wright from the Department of Energy was on Oklo's board - that kind of detail matters way more when you're actually tracking the companies. Tech stocks to buy now aren't just about quarterly earnings anymore, they're about infrastructure positioning. If you're serious about AI exposure, you need to think beyond just chip makers and actually consider the full stack. That's where the real opportunity is hiding.
2
0
0
0
TestnetScholar

TestnetScholar

3 ore fa
President Donald Trump is bringing Big Tech into the policy room, tapping 13 leaders in American technology onto his President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). According to a White House press release, the group includes Marc Andreessen (Andreessen Horowitz), Sergey Brin (Google), Safra Catz (Oracle), Michael Dell (Dell Technologies), Jacob DeWitte (Oklo), Fred Ehrsam (Coinbase co-founder), Larry Ellison (Oracle), David Friedberg (Ohalo Genetics), Jensen Huang (Nvidia), John Martinis (Google Quantum AI), Bob Mumgaard (Commonwealth Fusion Systems), Lisa Su (AMD), and Mark Zuckerberg (Meta). Co-chaired by David Sacks and Michael Kratsios, the council is tasked with addressing both the opportunities and risks of emerging technologies, in particular, their impact on jobs, as the US ramps up efforts to lead in artificial intelligence. The White House said the body could eventually expand to 24 members, with more appointments expected soon. The latest appointments come after Trump issued an executive order in January rebooting PCAST as a top-tier advisory group. Designed to secure American leadership in AI, quantum computing, and biotech, the council brings together experts from universities, tech companies, and government to provide unbiased, science-based advice on tech, the economy, security, and education, while pushing back against forces threatening scientific integrity. Trump rewards AI firms that play by the rules --------------------------------------------- The Trump administration is pushing an AI strategy focused on speed and global leadership, but recent actions have raised questions. Anthropic faced a major setback after being banned from federal use due to perceived supply-chain risks, amid tensions over military-related AI restrictions. In contrast, OpenAI secured a rapid agreement with the Department of Defense, including classified access with strict guardrails. **Disclosure:** This article was edited by Vivian Nguyen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
0
0
0
0
PositionPhobia

PositionPhobia

4 ore fa
Just been digging into the nuclear fission stocks space and noticed something interesting happening with NuScale and Oklo. Both are pushing small reactor technology but in pretty different ways, and the market's treating them wildly different right now. Let me break down what each company is actually doing. NuScale makes small modular reactors that fit into compact 65-foot vessels. They're the only ones with actual NRC design approval, which is huge. Their 77 MWe reactors are being used for Romania's RoPower project, and they've got TVA lined up for up to six gigawatts across seven states. But here's the catch - these plants won't actually start running until the early 2030s. We're talking years away. Oklo's playing a different game entirely. Their Aurora microreactors are even tinier at 1.5 MWe each, but you can chain them together for 15 to 100 MWe deployments. They use metallic uranium fuel that's denser and cheaper, plus the whole system recycles fuel in a closed loop so it runs about a decade without refueling. Oklo already broke ground on their first Idaho Powerhouse reactor and has an Air Force contract for Alaska. Their first revenue could actually hit in late 2027. Here's where the valuation gets wild. Oklo's sitting at a 9.7 billion market cap but trades at over 600 times its projected 2027 sales. That's insane for a company that hasn't deployed anything yet. NuScale's at 3.9 billion and looks way more reasonable at 19 times 2027 sales, though still pricey. The thing is, neither company will really make money for years. NuScale expects to go from 31 million in revenue this year to 287 million by 2028, mostly from engineering studies and licensing deals. Real growth doesn't kick in until those reactors actually come online. The market's clearly betting Oklo's earlier deployment timeline justifies the premium, but that's risky. Both nuclear fission stocks have massive potential if this technology scales, but the near-term catalysts are totally different. Oklo's got momentum from early 2027 deployments while NuScale's biggest wins are still years away. In this choppy market, that probably keeps Oklo ahead despite the questionable valuation. Personally? I think both plays could work out over the next decade, but NuScale might stay under pressure until those first plants actually power up. Oklo's the market darling right now, and that could persist as long as they hit their deployment targets. Worth watching how these nuclear fission stocks evolve over the next 18 months.
0
0
0
0