LPL

Prezzo LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs)

Closed
LPL
$3,93
+$0,06(+1,55%)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-08 04:09 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-08 04:09, LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL) is priced at $3,93, with a total market cap of $3,93B, a P/E ratio of 26,79, and a dividend yield of 0,00%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $3,79 and $3,96. The current price is 3,69% above the day's low and 0,75% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 3,46M. Over the past 52 weeks, LPL has traded between $3,68 to $4,05, and the current price is -2,96% away from the 52-week high.

LPL Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$3,87
Market Cap$3,93B
Volume3,46M
P/E Ratio26,79
Dividend Yield (TTM)0,00%
Dividend Amount$0,23
Diluted EPS (TTM)452,62
Net Income (FY)$226,31B
Revenue (FY)$25,81T
Earnings Date2026-05-21
EPS Estimate0,05
Revenue Estimate$3,95B
Shares Outstanding1,01B
Beta (1Y)1.153
Ex-Dividend Date2022-12-28
Dividend Payment Date2023-04-19

About LPL

LG Display Co., Ltd. engages in the design, manufacture, and sale of thin-film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) and organic light emitting diode (OLED) technology-based display panels. Its TFT-LCD and OLED technology-based display panels are primarily used in televisions, notebook computers, desktop monitors, tablet computers, mobile devices, and automotive displays. The company also provides display panels for industrial and other applications, including entertainment systems, portable navigation devices, and medical diagnostic equipment. It operates in South Korea, China, rest of Asia, the United States, Poland, and other European countries. The company was formerly known as LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd. and changed its name to LG Display Co., Ltd. in March 2008. LG Display Co., Ltd. was incorporated in 1985 and is headquartered in Seoul, South Korea.
SectorTechnology
IndustryConsumer Electronics
CEOChul-Dong Jeong
HeadquartersSeoul,None,KR
Employees (FY)60,79K
Average Revenue (1Y)$424,56M
Net Income per Employee$3,72M

LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL) FAQ

What's the stock price of LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL) today?

x
LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL) is currently trading at $3,93, with a 24h change of +1,55%. The 52-week trading range is $3,68–$4,05.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL)?

x

Should you buy or sell LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL)?

x

How to buy LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL) Latest News

2026-03-16 17:30

英雄联盟国际先锋赛 BLG 击败 BFX,Polymarket 盈利 TOP2 地址共获利超 10.5 万美元

Gate News 消息,3 月 16 日,据监测,Polymarket 上 3 月 16 日晚 9 点开赛的"英雄联盟国际先锋赛小组赛 BLG 对战 BFX"预测事件结果已确定,BLG 在本场 BO5 中取胜,总交易量 802 万美元。押注 BLG 获胜的榜一账户 avenger 单场盈利 75254 万美元,榜二账户 CryptoRED 单场盈利 31334 万美元。此前,两个地址曾合计押注约 26.8 万美元买入 BLG 胜利。其中,账户 avenger 买入 30 万份 share,买入均价 75¢;账户 CryptoRED 买入 74,566.5 份 shares,买入均价 57.9¢。英雄联盟国际先锋赛是 LOL 2026 年第一个国际性赛事,共有 8 支队伍参赛,包括 LPL 赛区 BLG、JDG;LCK 赛区 Gen.G、BFX;LEC 赛区 G2;LCS 赛区 LCS;CBLOL 赛区 LOUD;LCP 赛区 TSW,每场比赛均采用 BO5 赛制。BLG 下一场 BO5 的对手将是 G2 与 TSW 之间的胜者。

2026-03-16 08:30

Polymarket 上 BLG vs BFX 英雄联盟比赛预测成交量近百万美元,两地址押注 12 万美元看好 BLG 获胜

Gate News 消息,3 月 16 日,Polymarket 上预测今日 21:00 英雄联盟比赛 BLG vs BFX 的成交量达 98.6 万美元。其中,押注 BLG 获胜的榜一账户 Hikariii 买入 10 万份 share,买入均价 67.9¢,现价值 66500 美元;榜二账户 TwoHundredPerMarket 买入 9 万份 share,买入均价 67¢,现价值 59849 美元。 英雄联盟国际先锋赛是 LOL 2026 年第一个国际性赛事,共有 8 支队伍参赛,包括 LPL 赛区 BLG、JDG,LCK 赛区 Gen.G、BFX,LEC 赛区 G2,LCS 赛区 LCS,CBLOL 赛区 LOUD,LCP 赛区 TSW,每场比赛均采用 BO5 赛制。BLG vs BFX 比赛将于今日 21:00 举办。

2025-10-08 01:20

分析师:黄金的“热炒式上涨”仍在持续

金十数据10月8日讯,LPL Financial分析师Adam Turnquist表示,从技术分析来看,黄金的“热炒式上涨”仍在持续。这位首席技术策略师指出,每盎司4000美元的关口已接近长期上升价格通道上轨的阻力位。Turnquist特称,若金价突破这一通道,将构成看涨信号,意味着当前加速上行的趋势有望延续。但若是未能突破该阻力位,则表明黄金的热炒式上涨可能需要暂停或出现回调。Turnquist进一步表示,若突破失败,金价将首先获得20日均线的支撑。

2025-10-03 09:01

历史数据显示美股在美国政府停摆后1个月和3个月平均回报率均为正值

PANews 10月3日消息,LPL Financial首席技术策略师Adam Turnquist在周三的报告中指出,自20世纪70年代中期以来,美国共发生过50次政府停摆,平均持续8天,而股市在停摆后1个月和3个月的平均回报率均为正值,他写道:“尽管美国政府停摆给市场带来了新一层不确定性,但从历史来看,停摆持续时间较短,因此对经济的影响微乎其微。投资者通常会忽略与预算相关的干扰,更关注企业盈利、整体经济趋势及其他关键宏观经济因素。”

Hot Posts su LG Display Co Ltd (ADRs) (LPL)

MEVHunterBearish

MEVHunterBearish

29 minuti fa
NEW YORK (AP) — Stocks shook off an early stumble to finish with slim gains on Wall Street Thursday and close out their first winning week since the start of the Iran war. The early decline for stocks was driven by a surge in oil prices following a national address late Wednesday from President Donald Trump. He vowed the U.S. will continue to attack Iran and failed to offer a clear timetable for ending the conflict in the Middle East. Oil prices eased slightly during the day, but still remain elevated well above $100 per barrel. The S&P 500 rose 7.37 points, or 0.1%, to 6,582.69. Several days of solid gains this week helped the benchmark index notch a 3.4% gain for the week. That’s the first weekly gain since the conflict started for index at the heart of many 401(k) accounts. Stock markets will be closed for Good Friday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 61.07 points, or 0.1%, to 46,504.67. The Nasdaq composite rose 38.23 points, or 0.2%, to 21,879.18. Both indexes also notched weekly gains. A barrel of U.S. crude oil rose 11.3% to $111.54, though prices rose close to $114 at one point during the day. The price of Brent crude, the international standard, jumped 7.8% to $109.03 per barrel. Crude oil prices have been the main force behind the sharp swings for stocks globally. Shipping traffic has been severely curtailed in the Strait of Hormuz, where a fifth of the world’s traded oil passes through during peacetime. Related Stories Asian benchmarks jump after oil prices sink in response to the Iran ceasefire 2 MIN READ North Korea fires missiles toward sea after ridiculing South’s hopes for better ties 3 MIN READ Sen. Elissa Slotkin sits down with Trump voters in Iowa while campaigning for Democrats 4 MIN READ Crude oil prices had been sliding back toward $100 per barrel prior to Trump’s address on Wednesday. The U.S. only relies on the Persian Gulf for a fraction of the oil it imports, but oil is a commodity and prices are set in a global market. A disruption anywhere affects prices everywhere. Read More Stocks have been broadly sliding since the war began, with indexes often rising and falling sharply along with statements from Trump about the direction of the war. Just on Monday, the S&P 500 briefly neared a 10% drop from its record, a steep-enough fall that professional investors have a name for it: a “correction. The index gained ground Tuesday and Wednesday on hope that the war could end soon. “For markets, a prolonged conflict increases the risk of sustained pressures on inflation, global growth, interest rates, and equity valuations,” wrote Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist for LPL Financial, in a note to investors. Airlines and other travel-related companies were among the biggest losers on Thursday. United Airlines fell 3% and Carnival shed 3.5%. Tesla fell 5.4% after a report showing that sales over the past three months fell short of analysts’ expectations. **Sign up for Morning Wire:** Our flagship newsletter breaks down the biggest headlines of the day. Email address Sign up By checking this box, you agree to AP's Terms of Use and acknowledge that AP may collect and use your data pursuant to our Privacy Policy. Several big technology stocks gained ground to help counter losses elsewhere in the market. Intel jumped 4.9% and Advanced Micro Devices rose 3.5%. Treasury yields remained relatively steady in the bond market. The yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to to 4.30% from 4.32%. Wall Street is worried that higher energy prices are adding to already stubbornly high inflation. Rising fuel prices take a bigger chunk out of consumers’ wallets in several ways. Directly, gasoline prices in the U.S. have surged 36 percent from a month ago to average $4.08 per gallon, according to the auto club AAA. Indirectly, rising fuel prices tend to make a wide range of services and goods more expensive. Flights become more expensive as airlines raise ticket prices to offset rising fuel costs. Consumer goods become more expensive as shipping and transportation costs rise. Inflation has been stubbornly above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. The war and its corresponding surge in energy prices effectively pushes inflation higher and that has dashed hopes for the Fed to cut interest rates. Wall Street had hoped for the central bank to cut rates in order to help offset a weakening job market. Lower interest rates could help stimulate the economy by lowering borrowing costs, but they also risk worsening inflation. Traders came into 2026 forecasting several cuts to the Fed’s benchmark interest rate, which influences rates for mortgages and other loans. They are now expecting the benchmark rate to remain steady this year. The war has also caused an anomaly of sorts in the oil market. Brent crude oil futures are typically priced higher than those for U.S. crude oil, but the war flipped that on its head. Because of the supply constraints, the sooner a buyer needs a barrel of oil, the more they’ll have to pay. Right now, the most actively traded futures contract for U.S. crude oil is for delivery in May, while the Brent futures contract is for delivery in June. That shorter timeframe is why U.S. crude is trading for more than Brent. Tom Kloza, chief energy adviser at Gulf Oil, points out that a buyer who needs oil immediately will pay about $3 to $5 a barrel above the futures price for U.S. crude and an even steeper premium for Brent. ___ An earlier version of this story incorrectly reported the weekly percentage change for the S&P 500. ___ Associated Press journalists Chan Ho-Him and Matt Ott contributed to this report.
0
0
0
0
ForkLibertarian

ForkLibertarian

14 ore fa
Going into 2026, one of the catalysts for a continued bull market in stocks was the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates. But now, with the war in Iran bringing inflation concerns back to life, a rate increase is on the table. While bond traders and analysts price in relatively low odds of a rate hike this year, such a move would ripple through the stock market. “We’ve gone from [talking about] how many cuts will we see from the Fed to [asking if they’ll] raise rates,” says Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist at LPL Financial. He says that against this backdrop, the stock market would struggle, as investors would likely shift into “risk-off” mode, favoring defensive investments. “Best case would be a choppy market,” he says. Turnquist and others believe that within the stock market, a wide array of sectors would feel the impact, including financials, real estate, and consumer discretionary stocks. Oil Stokes Inflation, Sparks Rate Hike Expectations --------------------------------------------------- Just two months ago, investors generally expected the Fed would be cutting rates in 2026, continuing the easing last year that brought the central bank’s target down to a range of 3.50%-3.75% from 5.25%-5.50% in late 2024. Though inflation was holding above the Fed’s 2% target, a slowing jobs market was seen as providing room for one or two cuts. Then the US war with Iran began on Feb. 28, and oil prices jumped, fanning inflation concerns. Gas prices have risen by 30% on average since the start of the war, and higher diesel, jet fuel, and fertilizer costs could soon ripple through the economy. In response, expectations around the Fed have swung dramatically. According to the CME FedWatch Tool, there is now a 20% chance that the Fed will raise rates in 2026. A month ago, those odds were at zero. How Rising Rates Affect Stocks ------------------------------ Even unlikely scenarios find expression in the markets. Typically, rising rates are good for banks that are able to earn more money off loans. They’re bad for real estate developers and REITs that need to borrow money. Utilities are also sensitive to interest rates, on the theory that rising rates constrain capital spending plans. Rising rates also reduce household spending, deflate growth stock valuations, and are generally negative for investments that rely on debt financing, including small caps. Here’s a closer look at how a Fed rate hike could play out across key stock market sectors and industries. Financial Services ------------------ A wide array of companies is included in this sector, but “context matters,” says Sean Dunlop, director of equity research at Morningstar. The sector has already been hit by private credit and artificial intelligence disruption fears. Since the Iran war began, the iShares US Financial Services ETF IYG, which is based on the Dow Jones US Financial Services Index, is down 3.8%, versus a decline of 4.3% for the Morningstar US Market Index. Dunlop assesses how various parts of this sector could fare under higher rates: * **Banks:** If the economy is doing well, higher short-term rates are positive because they help widen the net interest margins from which banks make money. But that’s not necessarily the case at the moment, Dunlop says. * **Life insurers: **These generally benefit from higher yields on the shorter end of the portfolio. * **Asset managers and investment banks: **Much depends on the behavior of asset prices. “A flat or rising equity market is neutral; a correction is bad,” says Dunlop. Higher rates mute deal activity, equity underwriting, and trading activity. A decline in asset prices also bodes poorly for managers of private assets. And higher rates hit private credit and LBO funds. * **Rating agencies and exchanges:** Higher rates are bad for bond issuance, and therefore for rating agencies. But for exchanges, higher short-term rates are “a small net positive” because exchanges earn interest on collateral, says Dunlop. These are Dunlop’s favored stocks: * **MarketAxess **MKTX has faced declining market share in US corporate bond trading. But the market isn’t appreciating the strength of its international business, nor the benefit of recent investments and new product rollouts, which will lift operating margins, says Dunlop. * **LPL Financial Holdings** LPLA is the preeminent independent US wealth manager, “with underappreciated double-digit growth prospects and a very long runway in a growing market,” says Dunlop. Investors are “overly fixated on recently slower organic asset growth as the firm digests Commonwealth Financial. Adjusting for 2025 integration costs, we forecast 10-year compound annual growth rates of 10.0% for revenue, 10.8% for operating profit, and 13.7% for diluted earnings per share.” * **Blackstone** BX is the world’s largest alternative asset manager. Like others in the space, it has been hit by private credit concerns. Yet Blackstone has grown organically despite the more volatile markets of the past five years. Real Estate and REITs --------------------- Since the war began, the iShares Core REIT ETF USRT is down 6.4%, versus 4.3% for the US Market Index. REIT prices generally move inversely with interest rates. Any REIT particularly sensitive to the overall economy will be hurt, explains Kevin Brown, senior equity analyst at Morningstar. Brown says the name most sensitive to interest rates is Realty Income O, which has positioned itself as “The Monthly Dividend Company,” attracting investors when rates are low. The company also relies on executing billions of dollars in acquisitions each year to fuel overall growth. It executed $9.5 billion in acquisitions at an average return of 7.1% in 2023, well above the average interest rate of approximately 5.0% on the debt it issued to fund those deals. “If rates go up suddenly, that spread gets squeezed over time,” says Brown. Brown believes that one company that might withstand rising rates relatively well is Ventas VTR. The senior housing REIT “should have strong growth that isn’t tied to rising rates or the economy.” At a recent share price of $81, Ventas trades near Brown’s fair value estimate of $86. “If investors are looking to park money in a safe name that shouldn’t be affected by a rising rate environment, I think that one should continue to do well while most other REITs will decline,” he says. Consumer Discretionaries ------------------------ “If I had to categorize the sectors most negatively affected, one is consumer,” says Dominic Pappalardo, chief multi-asset strategist for Morningstar Wealth. “Prices and financing costs will go up as the US consumer is already tired and combating persisting inflation.” Companies that might suffer in this scenario are higher-end retailers such as Macy’s M or Nordstrom, says Pappalardo. “Typically, Walmart WMT and McDonald’s MCD do better when the economy is slowing down,” he adds.
1
0
0
0
ForkLibertarian

ForkLibertarian

15 ore fa
There isn’t much to worry about in the US stock market. As a group, US stocks are down just 4% since the start of the Iran war, and they’re outperforming markets around the world that led returns in 2025. Most observers previously thought the war would be winding down by now, but the longer it goes on, the greater the likely impact across the global economy and financial markets. The Iran War’s Risk to Semiconductor Stocks ------------------------------------------- One area to watch is the supply chain for semiconductor stocks. Last week brought the news that an Iranian strike led to Qatar taking 17% of the world’s liquefied natural gas production offline. This threatens the semiconductor chip industry, which is a key part of the artificial intelligence infrastructure buildout. As Phelix Lee, who covers key Asian semi stocks, wrote on March 10, “Rising energy prices, if prolonged, could be a near-term risk for chip manufacturers. Higher energy costs for AI data centers could slow AI infrastructure buildouts, while fabs in Taiwan and South Korea would face growing cost pressures from higher LNG prices.” The impact goes beyond the energy input. Other parts of the supply chain are at risk, most notably helium. “Helium is a byproduct of LNG processing, so large-scale damage to LNG infrastructure could lead to drawn-out shortages even if the war were to end, as additional time is needed to bring operations back online,” Lee wrote. A prolonged helium shortage could ultimately lead to high levels of defects in chip wafers, driving down profitability. Brian Colello, a senior equity analyst who covers US-based semiconductor stocks, adds that Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang downplayed the near-term risk from a helium shortage. “[Huang] thinks Taiwan Semiconductor has something like four to six months of inventory,” he says. From our London bureau, senior reporter Karen Gilchrist dives deeper into the risks for semiconductor stocks. How Much Will the Gas Price Surge Lift Inflation? ------------------------------------------------- Amid the war, with gas prices in the United States rising, investors should be ready to see that jump-start passing straight through to inflation readings, according to PIMCO economist Tiffany Wilding. Nationwide, consumers are paying about 30% more per gallon of gas than before the war started, by Wilding’s measure. Gas prices have about a 3% weighting in the Consumer Price Index. That equates to a 0.9-percentage-point month-to-month jump in inflation. (In February, the CPI rose 0.3%.) “Because we’ve seen that escalation throughout March, you’re going to see it spread lightly across March and April,” Wilding says. “The bottom line is that right now, if [elevated oil] prices are maintained, there will be an increase the headline reading of almost a percentage point as a result of the direct effect of gas prices. That’s pretty dramatic.” Of course, Federal Reserve officials and many investors focus on inflation excluding food and energy costs, and instead look at core inflation, since these goods can see wide swings in prices. But other aspects of core inflation data will also see an indirect impact, such as airfares. Airfares have a relatively small weighting in the CPI, and there isn’t a direct pass-through from jet fuel prices, but they will add to the upward pressure on inflation. Return Dispersion and the Stock Market’s “Weight Problem” --------------------------------------------------------- The war began as the stock market was solidly in a long-awaited rotation away from the mega-cap technology stocks that had largely led the bull market for three years. Big names, most notably Microsoft MSFT, saw their stocks stumble starting in October. Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist at LPL Financial, highlights that this rotation had led to a broadening of returns across the market from the highly concentrated landscape that had been dominating portfolios. “Before we moved into the Iran war this year, we had this big rotation out of technology stocks. What was important was that capital never flowed out of the market; it just rotated into other areas like materials and even some [consumer] staples,” Turnquist says. The result was a greater dispersion of positive returns away from a handful of big stocks. The irony is that while many market commentators viewed the concentration in Big Tech as a risk, this rotation was proving a drag on the market’s broad benchmarks. “We framed it up as ‘The S&P 500 has a weight problem,’” Turnquist says. With the top five largest stocks in the S&P 500 constituting some 25% of the index, “it takes six sectors to offset those five names, and that’s a problem for the market going up.” With the war, some of that dispersion has diminished and investors have gravitated back to some tech stocks, seeking safety from the economic uncertainty, Turnquist notes. But he says that whenever the conflict does end, barring a significant shock, the trend will resume. “[Dispersion] is going to be the theme of the year,” he says. Even beyond the war, Turnquist expects stocks to remain volatile against a backdrop of curveballs from monetary and government policy, as well as the looming midterm congressional elections. “This should create more choppiness and dispersion,” he says.
0
0
0
0