IEFA

Prezzo iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF

Closed
IEFA
$91,75
-$0,14(-0,15%)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-08 00:43 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-08 00:43, iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is priced at $91,75, with a total market cap of $183,81B, a P/E ratio of 0,00, and a dividend yield of 0,00%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $90,30 and $95,05. The current price is 1,60% above the day's low and 3,47% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 12,36M. Over the past 52 weeks, IEFA has traded between $78,35 to $98,82, and the current price is -7,15% away from the 52-week high.

IEFA Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$91,89
Market Cap$183,81B
Volume12,36M
P/E Ratio0,00
Dividend Yield (TTM)0,00%
Dividend Amount$1,71
Net Income (FY)$0,00
Revenue (FY)$0,00
Revenue Estimate$0,00
Shares Outstanding2,00B
Beta (1Y)1.02
Ex-Dividend Date2025-12-16
Dividend Payment Date2025-12-19

About IEFA

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of large-, mid- and small-capitalization developed market equities, excluding the U.S. and Canada.
SectorFinancial Services
IndustryAsset Management
HeadquartersNone,DE,US

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) FAQ

What's the stock price of iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) today?

x
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is currently trading at $91,75, with a 24h change of -0,15%. The 52-week trading range is $78,35–$98,82.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA)?

x

Should you buy or sell iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA)?

x

How to buy iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Hot Posts su iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA)

FomoAnxiety

FomoAnxiety

04-03 01:00
Nebius Group (NBIS) stock has gained more than 25% year-to-date and has rallied about 336% over the past year, as the cloud computing company is gaining from strong demand amid the artificial intelligence (AI) boom. The company recently struck a $27 billion deal with social media giant Meta Platforms (META) and a strategic partnership with Nvidia (NVDA), with the chip giant committing to invest $2 billion in the AI infrastructure company. ### End of Quarter Sale - 50% Off TipRanks Trade NBIS with leverage Even after a solid year-to-date rally, Wall Street’s average price target indicates further upside potential in NBIS stock. Analysts’ bullish stance is based on strong demand trends and a robust backlog. Now, according to TipRanks’ Ownership Tool, public companies and individual investors own 61.42% of Nebius. They are followed by other institutional investors, mutual funds, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) at 24.61%, 7.25%, and 6.72%, respectively. **Digging Deeper into Nebius’ Ownership Structure** --------------------------------------------------- Looking closely at the top shareholders, iShares owns the highest stake in Nebius at 3.47%, followed by David Gerald Greenspan (Slate Path Capital) with a 1.80% holding. Among the top ETF holders, iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) owns a 0.69% stake in NBIS, while the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) holds 0.34%. Moving to mutual funds, Alger Institutional Funds holds about 1.22% of Nebius. Meanwhile, Lazard Funds owns 1.12% of the company. **Is NBIS a Good Stock to Buy?** -------------------------------- Overall, Wall Street has a Strong Buy consensus rating on Nebius stock based on eight Buys and one Hold recommendation. The average NBIS stock price target of $164.22 indicates 53.3% upside potential. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue
0
0
0
0
MrDecoder

MrDecoder

03-27 18:38
**iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF **(IEFA 0.31%) and **iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF** (EEM 0.32%) differ sharply in cost, yield, sector exposure, and recent returns, reflecting their distinct focuses on developed versus emerging markets. IEFA targets developed markets outside the United States and Canada, providing broad diversification across Europe, Asia, and Australia. EEM, in contrast, invests in large- and mid-cap companies from emerging markets, particularly in Asia and Latin America. This comparison explores how these two global equity ETFs stack up on cost, performance, risk, and portfolio makeup. Snapshot (cost & size) ---------------------- | Metric | IEFA | EEM | | --- | --- | --- | | Issuer | IShares | IShares | | Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.72% | | 1-yr return (as of 2026-03-24) | 14.5% | 26.2% | | Dividend yield | 3.6% | 2.2% | | Beta | 0.85 | 0.64 | | AUM | $166.7 billion | $25.2 billion | _Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months._ EEM’s expense ratio is substantially higher than IEFA’s, making IEFA far more affordable for long-term holders. IEFA also offers a higher dividend yield, making it more appealing to income-focused investors seeking steady payouts. Performance & risk comparison ----------------------------- | Metric | IEFA | EEM | | --- | --- | --- | | Max drawdown (five years) | -30.41% | -37.82% | | Growth of $1,000 over five years | $1,235 | $1,089 | What's inside ------------- EEM tracks large- and mid-cap companies from emerging economies, leaning heavily on technology (34%) and Asian giants. Its top holdings are **Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing**(TSM 0.97%) at 12.51%, **Samsung Electronics Ltd**(SSU +3.26%) at 5.24%, and **Tencent Holdings Ltd**(TCEHY 0.75%) at 3.67%. With 1,223 holdings and a fund age of 23 years, EEM provides deep exposure to emerging-market growth stories but is concentrated in a few tech giants. IEFA, meanwhile, covers more than 2,600 companies from developed markets, with a tilt toward financial services (22%) and industrials (21%). Its largest positions include **Asml Holding Nv**(ASML 1.04%), **Astrazeneca Plc**(AZN +3.98%), and **Novartis Ag**(NVS 0.05%), each accounting for less than 2.3% of assets. IEFA’s diversification is broader, and its sector mix tends toward stability and income over high-octane growth. For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link. What this means for investors ----------------------------- International stocks are an important part of most investment portfolios. Here is how two key international exchange-traded funds (ETFs), iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM), match up. Let’s start with IEFA. This fund holds 2,600 stocks across many developed markets. Its chief advantage over EEM is its low fees. IEFA has an expense ratio of 0.07%, while EEM has an expense ratio of 0.72%. IEFA also has a higher dividend yield of 3.6%, while EEM has a dividend yield of 2.2%. EEM, on the other hand, is an emerging markets ETF. Therefore, it is more oriented to higher-risk growth stocks. EEM has performed well over the last year, recording a return of 26.2%, while IEFA has returned 14.5%. In summary, IEFA is better suited to income-oriented investors, those who are more risk-averse, and cost-conscious investors. Meanwhile, more aggressive investors may favor EEM for its potential to deliver outsize returns.
0
0
0
0
governance_ghost

governance_ghost

03-04 15:09
G8 Education (ASX:GEM) is facing significant headwinds in analyst confidence. The one-year average price target for the Australian education company has been revised downward to $0.64 per share, marking a substantial 26.06% decline from the previous consensus of $0.87 established on February 1, 2026. Despite this pessimistic repricing, the updated target still implies potential upside of 76.05% from the stock's latest closing price of $0.36, leaving room for optimism among value-oriented investors. ## What's Driving the G8 Reassessment? The analyst community now spans a wide range of opinions on G8 Education's fair value. Price targets currently range from a conservative low of $0.49 to an optimistic high of $0.79 per share. This widened dispersion suggests uncertainty about the company's near-term trajectory, though the persistence of positive targets indicates analysts aren't abandoning the stock entirely. The modest average target increase versus current prices reflects cautious confidence rather than enthusiasm. ## The Attractive Dividend Story: Why G8 Yields 14.47% G8 Education's most compelling feature for income-focused investors remains its exceptional dividend yield of 14.47%. To understand what this means, it's worth examining the company's dividend payout ratio—currently sitting at 0.00. This metric reveals how much of a company's earnings are returned to shareholders. A ratio approaching 1.0 (or 100%) signals a company redistributing nearly all profits as dividends, typically unsustainable long-term. For G8, the near-zero payout ratio suggests the company pays dividends from sources beyond current earnings. This approach is common among mature companies with limited growth prospects, which typically target payout ratios between 0.5 and 1.0. Growth-focused companies, by contrast, retain earnings to fund expansion, resulting in payout ratios from zero to 0.5. Importantly, G8's three-year dividend growth rate of 0.38% demonstrates modest but consistent annual increases, showing management's commitment to rewarding shareholders despite economic pressures. ## Institutional Investors Taking Stock: A Mixed Picture The fund community's stance on G8 Education tells a cautionary tale. Currently, 41 funds and institutions maintain positions in the company, down from 50 owners last quarter—representing an 18% reduction in institutional supporters. While the average portfolio weight dedicated to G8 among all funds has increased slightly to 0.04% (up 7.29%), the total share count owned by institutions has declined 5.51% to 60.188 million shares over the past three months. This paradox—rising average allocation weight paired with shrinking total holdings—suggests that while remaining investors are increasing their relative bets on G8, many institutions have opted for the exit. The overall trend points toward a thinning institutional interest base, though committed players appear to be deepening their conviction. ## Tracking Major Fund Movements in G8 Several prominent funds are actively managing their G8 positions, offering clues to institutional thinking: **Steady Hands:** The Dfa International Small Cap Value Portfolio (DISVX) maintains 10.993 million shares (1.45% ownership) with no changes last quarter, while the Dfa Investment Trust Co's Asia Pacific Small Company Series holds 4.42 million shares (0.58%) unchanged. These positions suggest some value-oriented managers view G8 as a stable holding. **Gradual Retreat:** Vanguard's Total International Stock Index Fund (VGTSX) reduced its stake from 11.156 million to 10.528 million shares—a 5.97% reduction. More significantly, the fund trimmed its overall G8 allocation by 37.10% last quarter. Similarly, Vanguard's Developed Markets Index Fund (VTMGX) pared holdings from 6.961 million to 6.568 million shares (5.98% reduction) and decreased its G8 weighting by 20.29%. **Modest Adjustments:** The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) slightly increased its position from 4.786 million to 4.846 million shares (1.23% growth), yet paradoxically cut its portfolio allocation to G8 by 31.39%—a move suggesting the company represents a smaller position in the fund's rebalancing. ## The Bottom Line for G8 Investors G8 Education presents a complex investment picture. The 26% analyst target reduction signals softening confidence, yet the resilient upside to current targets and the compelling 14.47% dividend yield maintain investor interest. The exodus of some institutional holders, combined with reduced position sizes among mega-funds, suggests caution about near-term catalysts. For dividend hunters, G8's yield remains tempting; for growth investors, the analyst repricing may warrant closer scrutiny of underlying business fundamentals. *Data provided by Fintel, a comprehensive investing research platform covering fundamentals, analyst reports, ownership data, and fund sentiment globally.*
0
0
0
0