RektHunter

Recently, there was an interesting incident in the Strait of Hormuz that we should pay attention to. An American-flagged tanker, the Stena Imperative, drew special attention from six Iranian guard ships in early February.
Here's how the story goes: the tanker was passing through a strategically important waterway when it was suddenly intercepted by the Iranian fleet. According to circulating reports, Iran communicated via radio instructions for the captain to turn off the engine and prepare for inspection. They claimed that the vessel had entered Iran's territorial waters without permission.
W

Lyn Alden will appear on The Wolf Of All Streets Podcast! Scott Melker just announced it on X. I'm really excited about this because Lyn Alden is one of the most credible analysts in the crypto space. There will definitely be a deep discussion about the latest market and trend developments. This podcast always delivers quality content, so it's definitely worth watching. Have you already followed this podcast?

So there's something interesting about the recent gold trend. Looking at the 50-year secular chart, gold has just completed forming a massive cup and handle pattern – this is a rare bullish signal. It means that the strong gold market now is not just a coincidence, but the result of a very powerful long-term consolidation.
The most interesting thing is that gold is starting to hit new all-time highs in every global currency, not just USD. This has been confirmed since early 2024 and indicates that this rally is not just a weak dollar phenomenon, but a genuine fundamental movement.
If we look a

I just looked at data from CME FedWatch about the market’s expectations for future Fed interest rates. It’s quite interesting; for March, the probability is still very low, only 15.3% for a 25 basis point cut. The majority of the market still expects the Fed to hold interest rates steady for now.
But what’s more interesting is the expectation for April. In April, the chance of a cut starts to rise to 29.7% for 25 basis points, while the probability of holding remains dominant at 67.2%. So the market is still fairly cautious about when the Fed will start cutting.
Looking further into June, the

So there’s a pretty interesting blockchain project called Tipcoin, basically they create a reward system on Twitter with tokens. The concept is simple but clever – users can connect their Twitter accounts, then every time they post using the hashtag #Tip or $Tip, they can earn points. These points can later be exchanged for airdropped TIP tokens in the future.
To understand what “tip” means in the context of Tipcoin, think of it as an appreciation mechanism – basically rewarding content creators for their contributions on Twitter. Their system calculates engagement based on views, likes, repli

I just thought of something quite important regarding prediction markets. If a single trader can influence the market outcome, then the market probably isn't suitable for trading at all, right? This is a fundamental issue about market integrity.
My thinking is this - a healthy prediction market should be sufficiently liquid and widely distributed so that no one person can move the price at will. If that can happen, it indicates a serious problem with the design or structure of the market.
On the other hand, media outlets like CoinDesk that cover the crypto industry have a big responsibility to

The negotiations about the structure of the crypto market are still ongoing. Senator Tim Scott says the progress has been quite promising. It seems the government is starting to take regulation in this sector seriously. That’s interesting—so there could be a new, clearer framework for the industry. But for now, let’s wait until a final decision is made. What do you think? Are you optimistic about how things are developing?

Just saw that BTC is still moving fluctuatively around the $73K area. Based on historical price movements, usually before a bottom forms, there is quite a bit of pressure beforehand. Similar to the history of laptop development, the market also needs a consolidation phase before moving to the next level.
Historical data shows the same pattern repeating many times. This may not be the actual bottom; there could still be deeper pressure. Experienced traders usually know this is a normal phase in the market cycle. Some people panic sell, but looking at history, such phases often become attractiv

Just saw the news that IREN plans to increase their processing capacity by up to 50%, which is quite significant. It seems they are seriously preparing to enter the open market. If their capacity can increase that much, it means they can handle more transaction volume or data processing. It's interesting to follow the development, especially if this is truly a step before an IPO or public offering. Has anyone been monitoring this project?

So lately I've noticed that Bitcoin is really showing a different performance from stocks and gold as Middle East tensions start to escalate. It's really interesting to see how crypto moves independently while the global markets are shaky like this.
From a hedging perspective, Bitcoin seems to be an increasingly attractive choice compared to traditional instruments. While stocks are swinging and gold remains flat, Bitcoin is showing volatility that can be exploited for trading. Some traders I know are even starting to allocate more into crypto assets rather than relying on traditional safe hav

I just looked at the Bitcoin support level analysis. Based on historical data, some say $60k could be a bounce point if the bearish trend continues. But now BTC is at $73.95k, so it's still quite far from that level. It's interesting if we draw it on paper with lines and observe the repeating pattern. Some traders seem to agree that $60k is a critical zone to watch. But yeah, there are still many other factors that can change the trajectory. Who knows, maybe it will go up again tomorrow haha

I just looked at data from a leading exchange, and it turns out that Bitcoin futures volume is now five times larger than spot trading. The scale ratio is 5.1x according to CryptoQuant, the highest level since mid-2023. This means that the scale ratio measures how dominant leverage trading is compared to direct buying.
If the scale ratio is this high, price movements become more reactive and volatile. Many liquidations occur, prices can swing wildly but ultimately return to the original level. That’s what Bitcoin has experienced over the past month.
From on-chain data, Bitcoin demand remains n

I just noticed an interesting phenomenon in the crypto market lately. Long-term Bitcoin hodlers are starting to sell again now, especially when the price begins to lag behind traditional assets. It seems they are getting nervous watching Bitcoin's stagnant performance compared to stocks or gold.
What makes it interesting is that this isn't just regular panic selling. These investors are experienced, so their decision to exit probably has fundamental reasons. Maybe they see signals I haven't caught, or perhaps the crypto market timing is just not aligned with traditional momentum. When I monito

Bitcoin just broke through the $74.24K level, and positive energy is clearly felt in the crypto market today. I notice that Circle and some other crypto stocks are leading the rally with quite strong movements.
What’s interesting to analyze here is the difference between the developing positive and negative sentiments. This upward momentum is driven by solid technical recovery, but of course, there are still skeptics about its sustainability. From a trader’s perspective, it’s important to consider both sides before making a decision.
Circle, in particular, is in the spotlight because of its st

I just saw the news that STS Digital launched a structured crypto platform, and they are collaborating with one of the leading crypto exchanges for distribution. It seems like a good move to reach a broader market.
But what’s interesting is that independence is the most important thing when covering this industry. Honestly, independence is the foundation that makes media credible. CoinDesk itself has a solid track record—they’ve proven they can cover serious news responsibly (remember their coverage of FTX?). Their journalists follow strict ethical guidelines.
What’s a bit more complex is thei

Recently, Ukraine blocked Polymarket, a fairly popular prediction market platform. They included it in broader online gambling crackdowns. It made me wonder, is trading considered gambling? Because on one hand, Polymarket is a place where people trade prediction contracts, but the government sees it as a form of gambling. It's also interesting how regulations in various countries are becoming stricter about this. It seems they are worried about the risks being too high for users. So, what exactly is the difference between regular trading and what is considered gambling? Does it depend on lever

So, here's the thing, recently Ray Dalio said he's tired or exhausted with the always-pessimistic crypto narrative.
But crypto bulls are actually turning the tables, challenging this 'tired' perspective with compelling arguments about Bitcoin's future.
If we look at the meaning of tired in this context, it's not just physical exhaustion, but more mental fatigue from constantly hearing the same skepticism.
Ray Dalio seems to feel tired of how people keep questioning Bitcoin's viability as a long-term asset.
However, the crypto bull community sees this as an opportunity.
They argue tha

Attention has been drawn to the latest developments behind the scenes of negotiations on the RUU struktur pasar kripto. It turns out the main obstacle is not individual banks, but banking trading groups that have a zero-sum mindset toward the crypto industry.
One senior figure from a major crypto exchange has just disclosed this at an industry forum last week. According to him, banking trading groups view crypto as a threat rather than an opportunity. They negotiate with the mindset that if crypto wins, banking must lose.
Even more interestingly, other data on the position of the banking indus

ZeroLend officially shut down after three years of operation. This decentralized lending protocol ultimately could not withstand a collapsing economy, thin liquidity, and ongoing security issues. Interestingly, they decided to make a graceful exit with the top priority: ensuring users can withdraw their assets safely.
The main problem is a combination of several factors. Price oracle providers stopped supporting, networks like Manta, Zircuit, and XLAYER became ghost towns in terms of liquidity, and the protocol's profit margins basically disappeared. Coupled with the high-risk profile of the l

Just read a tech investor's opinion on crypto—he said crypto is a different creature, so it doesn't fit into their AI portfolio. It's interesting because many people think crypto will become part of the future tech stack. But if you think about it, crypto really has its own dynamics that don't always align with AI's trajectory. So it doesn't mean crypto isn't worth it, just a different category. What do you think, do you agree or disagree with this take?