2025lovepeace

To identify "premature ejaculation" men, you must choose three independent systems. One of the most commonly used is the so-called technical approach. Purely technical methods are not sufficient, and purely non-technical methods are also inadequate. Technical methods must, and can only, be effective within these three independent systems. The core idea of technical analysis is classification, which is a point that almost all technical practitioners fail to understand clearly. When a technical indicator issues a buy signal, technical enthusiasts often interpret it as a divine hint, holding such a view, almost all technical practitioners find it difficult to achieve significant success. Technical indicators are merely a way to fully classify all possible market movements; the reason why technical practitioners are often experts in hindsight but struggle to succeed in practice is this. There are many things that can be said about technical analysis—these indicators, those indicators, how to apply them—the key lies in the classification problem mentioned above. Any technical indicator simply points out, from the perspective of this indicator after a complete classification, what can be done and what cannot be done. The question of whether this indicator's signals perfectly reflect actual market movements is definitely answered with no; otherwise, everyone could operate based on this indicator, and there would be no one losing money. However, as long as we examine technical indicators purely from a classification perspective, they will demonstrate their greatest power. The simplest and most practical technical indicator system is the so-called moving average system. Clearly, the moving average system is not very precise, with many false signals. If you buy just by breaking through a certain moving average,

Even if watching AV, in the end, it's for practical experience. The previous chapter discussed a lot about "kissing," with the purpose of doing rather than just watching. Watching without doing, wouldn't that become Yin Jiu You? Watching too much AV without practice definitely harms health. But doing involves risk issues. Any position involved carries risks, and unless the market moves in a certain way, even the simplest moving average system can't guarantee beforehand exactly how to "kiss." Those familiar with this ID's interpretation of "The Analects" know that risk is "not to be feared," it has no rank, and any reckless pursuit of absolute risklessness in investment is wishful thinking. The only way is to set up a system that makes the risk, which has no rank and is "not to be feared," become ranked within that system. The "fearful" system is the only way to long-term market victory. It must be based on one's actual situation, such as funds, operational skills, etc., and establish a classification evaluation system. Then, according to this system, set up corresponding response procedures for all possible situations. In this way, all risks are managed in an operable manner. The only thing the operator needs to do is, once a corresponding situation occurs, take the appropriate action. For stocks, the actual operations are nothing more than three types: buy, sell, hold. Of course, in practice, there's also a matter of quantity, which relates to fund management, so let's temporarily set that aside. Therefore, any investment operation evolves into a simple mathematical problem: N completely classified risk scenarios, corresponding to three choices (buy, sell, hold). For example,

Is it a good man if he doesn't wear a condom? Let's not discuss this question for now. Operating without a condom is definitely not a good operation ticket, especially for large funds! There are two types of condom use: one is proactive, and the other is passive. What is passive condom use? It means entering without knowing why you are entering, being caught in a blind state, and then there is a very wrong theory that says you should cut losses when the loss reaches a certain point. Operating according to this method, success is ultimately impossible. Almost all investors are in this passive condom use, these people are all caught by being caught. In fact, there is never a real problem of cutting losses; the only issue is whether the stock is still within a manageable range. Only in this sense does a cut-loss exist: when a stock's trend shifts from manageable to unmanageable.
Please note, from a profit and loss perspective, this does not mean the operation has failed; it may have already gained significantly. The only reason to exit is that the stock's trend can no longer be managed. One of the worst flaws in the investment market is entering and exiting based on profit and loss, but profit and loss are not a priori; they are determined by the current trend at the moment. It is passive. Entering and exiting based on profit and loss is based on passive factors—what is passive condom use if not this?
What is active condom use? There are two meanings here. First, entry cannot be completed in one go, especially for large funds. If you do not adopt an active condom use approach, how can you buy enough? Those claiming they never use condoms are definitely never operating with large funds. But more importantly, any entry involves an active protective measure. This protection is to prevent the situation from turning into an unmanageable state.

Regarding market trends, one thing that is "not to worry about" is the three classifications of trends: uptrend, downtrend, and consolidation. All trends can be broken down into these three situations. This is a very simple principle, and it is the only reliable foundation for market analysis. Many people tend to ignore the simplest things and focus on those complicated and superficial methods. Whether you are a main force, retail investor, or a market maker, you cannot escape the trend patterns woven by these three classifications. So, what are uptrend, downtrend, and consolidation? Here is a definition. First, it must be clarified that all uptrends, downtrends, and consolidations are based on certain cycle charts. For example, a consolidation on a daily chart might be an uptrend or downtrend on a 30-minute chart. Therefore, a specific chart is the basis for judgment, and the choice of chart is consistent with the trading system mentioned above, which relates to your capital, personality, and trading style. Uptrend: The most recent high point is higher than the previous high point, and the most recent low point is higher than the previous low point. Downtrend: The most recent high point is lower than the previous high point, and the most recent low point is lower than the previous low point. Consolidation: The most recent high point is higher than the previous high point, and the most recent low point is lower than the previous low point; or the most recent high point is lower than the previous high point, and the most recent low point is higher than the previous low point. The key to operation is not the definition itself, but how to fully understand the definition to establish a solid foundation for trading. The difficulty lies in how to grasp the high and low points, because high points and low points have their levels. A high point seen on a 30-minute chart may not be visible on a weekly chart. For this, a moving average system must be used to

All trends at any level can be broken down into two categories: trend and consolidation, and the trend can be further divided into upward and downward. The above conclusion is not something that falls from the sky, but is summarized from countless analyses of graphical patterns, just as the Analects say, “By teaching you, do you understand! To understand is to understand; not to understand is not to understand; this is understanding.” (Please see the corresponding series explanation of this ID — Note: Confucius said: Practice teaches you, and through this you gain wisdom. Further practicing based on wisdom leads to new wisdom; practicing without relying on wisdom will not produce new wisdom. This is the most fundamental wisdom.) This simple experience summarized from actual graphics is the only solid foundation for all technical analysis theories. Everyone involved in technical analysis knows this foundation, but unfortunately, no one delves deeper, and then they sink into the苦海 of technical indicators, trading systems, and so on. Imagine, if the foundation is not clear, what can be built upon it? Once the foundation is solid, technical indicators and trading systems are trivial. From this, we can conclude: “Chan Zhong Shuo Chan’s Basic Principles of Technical Analysis 1”: Any trend type at any level will eventually complete. The more concise way to say this is “trends will ultimately be perfect.” The importance of this principle lies in transforming the difficult-to-apply, static summary of practice — “all trends at any level can be broken down into trend and consolidation” — into a dynamic, practical statement: “trend types will ultimately complete.” This is the wisdom mentioned in the Analects: “All trends at any level can be broken down into trend and consolidation” is “

First, let's list some of the most basic concepts, principles, and theorems:
Trend: The trend seen when opening the chart. Trends are divided into different levels.
Trend types: Uptrend, downtrend, consolidation.
Trend: Upward, downward.
ZhongShu (Central Zone) in Chan Zhong Shuo Zen Trend: The part of a certain level's trend type that is overlapped by at least three consecutive sub-level trend types. The specific calculation is based on the overlap of the previous three consecutive sub-level trend types, which can be expressed with strict formulas as follows: For three consecutive sub-level trend types A, B, C, their respective high and low points are a1/a2, b1/b2, c1/c2. Then, the zone of the central area is (max(a2, b2, c2), min(a1, b1, c1)). In practice, this can be estimated visually without such complexity. Note that the first three trend types at the sub-level must be completed to form the ZhongShu in the Chan Zhong Shuo Zen trend; completed trend types ( (consolidation and trend) are very obvious on the sub-level charts, so there's no need to look further down to lower levels.
Chan Zhong Shuo Zen consolidation: In any trend at any level, a completed trend type that contains only one ZhongShu in the Chan Zhong Shuo Zen trend is called the consolidation at that level.
Chan Zhong Shuo Zen trend: In any trend at any level, a completed trend type that contains at least two or more ZhongShu in the same direction in sequence is called the trend at that level. If the direction is upward, it is called an uptrend; if downward, a downtrend. Note that there must be absolutely no overlap between the ZhongShu in the trend in Chan Zhong Shuo Zen.

Those support and resistance levels, channel lines, third waves, and similar tools are only good for manipulators to create deceptive signals. If you truly understand the theory of this ID, you will find that all phenomena described in other technical analysis can be explained within this ID's framework, and corresponding boundaries for their validity can also be provided. For example, after a stock is newly listed and drops directly in five waves, then reverses to form an upward five-wave V-shape, wave theory cannot explain this, but using the central pivot theorem from Chan's trend analysis makes it an easy problem to solve. These theories all standardize complex movements into certain fixed patterns, just like how the face of a concubine claiming that love without a condom isn't love is laughable. For manipulators, they have long studied the so-called technical analysis theories recognized by ordinary people more thoroughly than anyone else. Anyone who has been a market maker knows that technical charts are used to deceive; the more classic the pattern, the more it can deceive. But the only thing that manipulators cannot escape from is the most fundamental elements discussed in this ID's analysis (note: the central pivot, the trend and consolidation levels based on the level), because these are inherently "not to be feared" by the market. As long as they are part of the market, they are inevitably involved, and manipulators are no exception. Just like any great savior, they cannot escape birth, aging, illness, and death. It is necessary to emphasize here that the technical analysis system in this ID's theory is only one of three independent systems. The most fundamental is the mathematical validity guaranteed by the probability principles underlying these three independent systems. But the reason why the technical analysis system is important is because, for a retail investor with no information, it is the fairest and most accessible tool.

Note: The expansion of the central level mainly focuses on the original definition of the central. Without at least three consecutive secondary level trend types overlapping, a higher-level central cannot be expanded. It has been clearly pointed out earlier that in Chan Zhong Shuo Zen trend, the central is determined by the overlapping part of the first three consecutive secondary trend types. There are two situations for subsequent trends: 1. Extension of the central. 2. Formation of a new same-level central (Note: 2.1: New central formation; 2.2: After producing a new same-level central, the previous central expands into a large central). In trends, the same-level central in the previous and subsequent Chan Zhong Shuo Zen trend cannot have any overlap, including any overlap between momentary fluctuations around the trend central (Note: New central formation). Therefore, if the overlapping interval of three consecutive secondary trend types does not overlap with the previous trend central, but the fluctuations around this central touch a momentary fluctuation interval of the previous trend central's continuation, then this trend type cannot be considered a trend, but only a Chan Zhong Shuo Zen central of a higher level (Note: Central expansion). (Note: The previous paragraph describes three situations; 1. Central extension; 2. New formation without overlapping the current level central; 3. Fluctuations of a new current level central touching the previous central's continuation fluctuation interval, producing a higher-level central). Here, the two situations must be strictly distinguished (Note: Distinguish between situations 1 and 3): 1. Trend central and its extension. In this case, all two secondary fluctuations around the trend central must at least touch the central's interval. Otherwise,

The so-called 100% safe buy and sell points are those after which the market must turn, with no ambiguity or need for discernment. The second type of buy point does not necessarily appear at the top or bottom of the central area; it can appear anywhere. When it appears below the central area, the subsequent strength is questionable. Teaching you stock trading 21: Complete analysis of the buy and sell points in Chan Zhong Shuo Chan's trading method. Previously, three types of buy and sell points have been discussed. A very practical question is: besides these three types, are there any other types of buy and sell points? The answer is no. It must be emphasized here that these three types of buy and sell points are all guaranteed by theory—100% safe buy and sell points. If one does not fully understand the absolute safety of these three types of buy and sell points, it is impossible to have a thorough understanding of Chan Zhong Shuo Chan's technical analysis theory. Ultimately, market trading boils down to grasping buy and sell points; the completeness of buy and sell points is the completeness of the theory. The so-called 100% safe buy and sell points are those after which the market must turn, with no ambiguity or need for discernment. From the above series of analyses on Chan Zhong Shuo Chan's central trend, it can be seen that at any point in the trend, there are inevitably two possibilities: continuation or reversal of the trend. In other words, for a certain buy point, it must satisfy one of the following two conditions: either a continuation upward or a reversal from below to above. For the continuation case, it can only occur during an upward process; otherwise, there is no point in calling it a continuation. For buy points generated during an upward continuation,

Technology is only the most superficial thing. The same technology, on a purely technical level, as long as one can correctly understand the logical relationships within it and grasp the core, there is no problem. But the key is application, and here lies a huge difference. The market is full of endless temptations and traps, corresponding to human greed and fear. Merely staying at the technical level, at most, makes you a trading machine. Recently, even if you can achieve certain returns in the market, such returns come at the cost of life. No matter how great the returns, they cannot compare to the expenditure of life. Life can only be repaid by life; life is meant to understand life, not for the so-called returns that bring nothing when alive and take nothing when dead.
But there are some people who think they are noble, who believe that staying away from money and the market is the so-called Dao. Sadly, these people are nothing but fools; their so-called Dao is merely a product of self-indulgence. Dao is not far from people; how can it conflict with the market? Human greed, fear, market temptations, and traps—where are they from the Dao? In contemporary society, those who do not understand the capital market are fundamentally unqualified to survive, and being trapped in the capital market is only a mechanical form of existence.
In modern society, a capitalist society, no matter how much it can be criticized, it constitutes the only current reality of survival. Of course, you can resist this kind of existence, but all resistance will ultimately become capitalist, just like the game of moral capital and power capital in relation to the game of capital. Understanding and participating in the capital market, besides using it to catch that pie in the sky and other small calculations, is also because this capital and this capital market are the current fate of humanity.

The so-called "kiss" is related to the moving average system, and the moving average system is just a simple mathematical treatment of the trend. Frankly speaking, it is inseparable from probability. This is completely different from the concepts of central zones and others mentioned later, so it is essential to understand clearly and not confuse the moving average system with the central zone. The moving average system, in essence, is the same as indicators like MACD; it is only an auxiliary tool. Because these tools are relatively simple and easy to grasp, those who do not want to study in depth can start by understanding these first. However, "learning is never enough," and if one cannot thoroughly investigate the matter, they will ultimately be "afraid of missing out." Therefore, it is crucial to understand the central zone and other concepts thoroughly. MACD, as an auxiliary system, is still very useful. The sensitivity of MACD depends on its parameters, usually set to 12, 26, and 9, which are sufficient for general trends. But for very rapid movements, the reaction on a 1-minute chart is too slow( Note: The maximum value of MACD bars for the fastest movements can be referenced, and if engaging in ultra-short-term trading, one must look at the actual trend. For example, looking at the 1-minute chart of 600779, the move from 16.5 up to 19 clearly shows a continuous extension of a 1-minute upward trend. How to grasp the ultra-short selling points in such a trend? It’s not hard to see that the lengthening of MACD bars is related to divergence, roughly indicating the deviation between the trend and the moving average. When opening a MACD chart, one should be very sensitive to the typical height of MACD extension for that stock. During consolidation, MACD usually extends to a certain height and then definitely pulls back. In a trend, this

First, it is essential to understand what market risk is. Regarding risks, different qualitative labels can be applied, such as policy risk, systemic risk, trading risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, and so on. However, from a purely technical perspective, all risks are inevitably reflected in price movements. Ultimately, all risks boil down to the risk of price volatility. For example, some tokens have a very high win rate in the market, but their prices keep rising without stopping. From a purely technical standpoint, their risk can only be measured technically, without considering win rates or similar factors.
A key premise for the validity of this ID theory is that the traded assets analyzed by the theory must be able to continue trading within a foreseeable timeframe. For instance, a token traded on a daily chart that stops trading after one week becomes meaningless because it no longer meets the most basic premise. Of course, if you trade on a 1-minute chart, even if trading stops after a week, the risk is technically controllable. The only uncontrollable factor is not knowing when trading might be suddenly halted—this is the biggest technical vulnerability. Therefore, this ID theory is not万能 (all-powerful); the only limitation is the sudden halt of trading, which invalidates the premise of the theory.
Of course, a more extreme scenario is when trading is completely stopped, which is equivalent to halting trading altogether. This is not a fanciful idea; in immature markets, it is not surprising. When applying this ID theory, the only risks to watch out for are whether trading can continue and whether the results are valid. For assets that are likely to stop trading, it is best not to use

The occurrence of divergence after the second central pivot generally accounts for the vast majority of cases, especially on daily charts and above, reaching nearly 90% or more. Therefore, if a second central pivot appears on a daily chart or higher, close attention should be paid to the emergence of divergence. The most useful application of consolidation divergence is on larger timeframes, particularly at least weekly charts or above. Divergence detected in such consolidations often indicates a historic bottom.
Taking Vanke as an example, in the third segment on the quarterly chart, one can find divergence related to the last central pivot on the monthly chart. This divergence segment must be within the divergence segment on the quarterly chart, and the interval is smaller. Extending this process from the monthly to weekly, daily, 30-minute, 5-minute, 1-minute charts, and even to each trade, the interval continuously shrinks.
In this trend, there are definitely at least two central pivots of the same level. Divergence will not occur after the first central pivot but at least after the second one. For extended trends, divergence may only occur after the 100th central pivot. Of course, such cases are rare and may only be seen once in a hundred years.
The occurrence of divergence after the second central pivot generally accounts for the vast majority of cases, especially on daily charts and above, reaching nearly 90% or more. Therefore, if a second central pivot appears on a daily chart or higher, close attention should be paid to the emergence of divergence.
In smaller timeframes, such as 1-minute charts, this ratio is smaller but still constitutes the majority. Divergence typically appears after 4 or 5 central pivots, which is quite rare.

The animal called the "market maker" is very mysterious to most people, but for this ID, it's just too common. The dichotomy between market makers and retail investors is probably more suitable to the thinking patterns of modern Chinese people, which is why it has become such common knowledge. However, common sense is often synonymous with collective fallacy. Not only retail investors, but many so-called market makers have also sacrificed themselves in this regard. Generally speaking, a market maker is someone who holds a large amount of capital and can control stock movements. In the myth of market makers, they are described as omnipotent, capable of surpassing technical indicators, fundamental analysis, and even the overall market trend. Here, we're only talking about individual stock market makers; as for national-level market makers, they have become the so-called gods of retail investors. Rumors about these market maker gods never cease in the market, spreading the fallacy of common knowledge. But the so-called market makers keep coming one after another, their bones piled high. A few days ago, at a private gathering, I also met an old uncle from the 1950s who said he had prepared two billion to sit in the market and asked this ID to contact the head of a certain company. That person is also a well-known figure, and I didn't want to embarrass him publicly, so I secretly mocked him—his brain is practically rusted. Of course, even though the myth of market makers has become so common, these fools will continue to come forward one after another. And precisely because there are so many of these fools, hunters can harvest abundant gains. The more market maker charts the hunters see, the happier they are; anyway, this type of person usually doesn't last more than a few years in the market before they are basically gone. There are no real market makers in the market—only winners and

Those who love to boast are the most common in the market, such as a profession that makes a living by analyzing the market and bragging—what we call stock commentators or experts. These people are nothing but parasites in the market; true hunters only observe and act. You can't fight wolves with your mouth. The market is a hunting ground; first, you need to become a good hunter. And a hunter must first be accustomed to silence. If there is any truth, it is also silent. What can be spoken of are merely the products of human thoughts, foul and stinking. When it becomes truly unspeakable, then it is beyond words; speaking without words is the true speech. A good hunter may have no mouth, but they must have a pair of eyes that are unaffected by external things. Under these eyes, everything appears transparent like illusions. To avoid being moved by external things, one must first not be deceived by the self. In fact, external things and the self are nothing but illusions and empty flowers. Only then can one move through them with ease. The hunter only cares about the prey; the prey is not obtained through analysis. The prey is not what you think, but what you see. Trust your eyes, not your mind, and certainly do not let your mind influence your eyes. Eyes influenced by the mind are full of prejudices, and all prejudices are nothing but bait that leads you into the final trap. Hunters are not afraid of traps; they simply watch the prey fall into various traps repeatedly, in different ways but with the same outcome. Here, there is no need for analysis—just watch and act! The quality of a hunter is not based on how many tricks they can recite, but on their intuition in their environment. A good hunter sees without seeing; heart and matter are in harmony. If you do not understand this, the simplest thing is to throw you alone into...

Design a program that classifies all investment targets, focusing only on those that can be managed. This is the first principle of investing. The programs used for classification can vary widely, but one thing is certain: no program can ensure that all selected manageable targets will ultimately lead to exciting outcomes 100% of the time, just as no program for selecting partners can guarantee that all chosen partners will ultimately lead to climax 100% of the time. Because any operational program inevitably faces the issue of "premature ejaculation," just as any selection of partners inevitably faces the challenge of identifying "premature ejaculation" men. The reason why identifying "premature ejaculation" is so difficult, causing countless so-called experts to meet their demise, is that "premature ejaculation" truly requires real effort and hands-on work to discover. This is far more complex and risky than identifying ED. ED can be detected early without deep involvement, but "premature ejaculation" cannot; you have to try it at least once. And this is a one-shot deal—just because it works this time doesn't guarantee it will work next time. Therefore, effective identification, early detection, and minimizing losses become top priorities. Many so-called experts claim that when certain conditions occur, the stock will rise. But in reality, any situation has a high probability of "premature ejaculation" occurring, and what was once certain to succeed suddenly becomes impossible to manage, turning the investment into a trap. Such situations are extremely common in investing. So, how to identify "premature ejaculation" men? The primary method is strict capital management. Once "premature ejaculation" occurs, you must exit immediately, even if it suddenly stops "premature ejaculation" afterward, and strongly

Any chart of any market instrument and any cycle can be broken down into a combination of three basic situations: upward, downward, and consolidation. Upward and downward movements form trends, and how to determine trends versus consolidations is the core issue in analyzing market movements (note: pay attention to the differences before and after the definitions). A fundamental question is that trends are hierarchical; an upward move on a 30-minute chart may just be a consolidation or even a rebound within a downtrend on a daily chart. Therefore, discussing trends and consolidations without considering the hierarchy is meaningless; this must be understood clearly. Note that the following and previous discussions, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are conducted at the same hierarchical level. Only after understanding the same level can different level trends be combined in analysis—that is a matter for later.
The three basic trends—upward, downward, and consolidation—can form six possible combinations representing three different types of movements: trap-like: upward-downward; downward-upward. Reversal: upward-consolidation-downward; downward-consolidation-upward. Relay: upward-consolidation-upward; downward-consolidation-downward. Market movements can be decomposed and studied through these three types of trends. From a bullish perspective, the first consideration is buying. Therefore, among the six basic trend patterns, the ones with buying value are: downward-upward, downward-consolidation-upward, and upward-consolidation-upward. Those without buying value are: upward-downward; upward-consolidation-downward; downward-consolidation-downward. It is not difficult to see that if you buy during a downward trend, the only subsequent trend you will encounter without buying value is downward-consolidation-downward.

Chinese people like to speak in reverse, about face, "face" is definitely not the priority. When choosing a face, first look at the face, ultimately look at the "inside." What is the "inside"? It is "G-spot centered, rejecting ED men!" This is also a warning about investment from this ID. People who try to deceive others with investments always like to create some myths about "face." Such as fundamental, technical, psychological, and capital aspects—these faces and sides are just like the "face" of a face, merely excuses to delve into the "inside." Without the "G-spot centered, rejecting ED men!" "inside," what meaning do these faces and sides have? The result of investment is very simple: just "lose or win." All theories and tricks about investment attempt to control some kind of "input" to eliminate the outcome of "loss." Therefore, all related theories are necessarily based on this logical assumption: that there is a necessary logical relationship and causal chain connecting input and output. This logical assumption is equivalent to saying "the face and its inside of a face have a necessary logical relationship." If this can be true, then handsome men must have their G-spot surging, and rugged men with full beards must be non-ED men. Just go out and look at a few faces to see how absurd such assumptions are. However, in reality, attempting to skip the "face" and directly reach the "inside" is also a kind of absurd fantasy. Even if there is no necessary connection between the "face" and the "inside," reality still only allows moving from "face" to "inside." Those who try to deny all "faces" and directly equate the "inside" with the G-spot are merely mistaking some "face" for the "inside." Such people are deceived for a lifetime without realizing it.

金刚经 第一品 法会因由分如是我闻：一时，佛在舍卫国祇树给孤独园，与大比丘众千二百五十人俱。尔时，世尊食时，著衣持钵，入舍卫大城乞食。于其城中次第乞已，还至本处。饭食讫，收衣钵，洗足已，敷座而坐。金刚经 第二品 善现启请分时，长老须菩提，在大众中，即从座起，偏袒右肩，右膝著地，合掌恭敬，而白佛言：“希有，世尊！如来善护念诸菩萨，善付嘱诸菩萨。世尊！善男子、善女人发阿耨多罗三藐三菩提心，云何应住？云何降伏其心？”佛言：“善哉，善哉！须菩提！如汝所说，如来善护念诸菩萨，善付嘱诸菩萨。汝今谛听，当为汝说。善男子、善女人发阿耨多罗三藐三菩提心，应如是住、如是降伏其心。”“唯然，世尊！愿乐欲闻。”金刚经 第三品 大乘正宗分佛告须菩提：“诸菩萨摩诃萨，应如是降伏其心：所有一切众生之类，若卵生、若胎生、若湿生、若化生；若有色、若无色；若有想、若无想、若非有想非无想，我皆令入无余涅槃而灭度之。如是灭度无量无数无边众生，实无众生得灭度者。何以故？须菩提！若菩萨有我相、人相、众生相、寿者相，即非菩萨。”金刚经 第四品 妙行无住分“复次，须菩提！菩萨于法应无所住行于布施，所谓不住色布施，不住声、香、味、触、

德经01（通行本38）上德不德，是以有德；下德不失德，是以无德。上德无为而无以为也；上仁为之而无以为也；上义为之而有以为也；上礼为之而莫之应也，则攘臂而乃之。故失道。失道矣，而后德；失德而后仁；失仁而后义；失义而后礼。夫礼者，忠信之泊也，而乱之首也。前识者，道之华也，而愚之首也。是以大丈夫居亓厚而不居亓泊，居亓实而不居亓华，故去皮取此。02（通行本39）昔之得一者：天得一以清。地得一以宁。神得一以灵。浴得一以盈。侯王得一而以为正。亓致之也：胃天毋已清，将恐莲；胃地毋已宁，将恐发；胃神毋已灵，将恐歇；胃浴毋已盈，将恐渴；胃侯王毋已贵以高，将恐蹶。故必贵而以贱为本，必高矣而以下为基。夫是以侯王自胃曰孤寡不。此亓贱之本与？非也。故致数，与无与。是故不欲禄禄若玉，硌硌若石。03（通行本41，40）上士闻道，堇能行之；中士闻道，若存若亡；下士闻道，大笑之，弗笑不足以为道。是以建言有之，曰：明道如费，进道如退，夷道如类。上德如浴，大白如辱，广德如不足，建德如偷，质真如渝。大方无禺，大器免成，大音希声，天象无刑。道隐无名。夫唯道，善始且善成。反也者，道之动也；弱也者，道之用也。天下之物生于有，有生于