There's an interesting question I want to discuss: why do some leading exchanges continuously promote token applications within their ecosystems? From a lock-up perspective, this has a significant impact on token consumption.

But there's a contradiction here—have you noticed that the gas fees on certain chains are kept particularly low? Theoretically, this should increase token consumption, right? So, what’s the result? The answer is quite clear: low gas fees actually do not effectively increase consumption.

So, if that's the case, why does the entire ecosystem still do this? It's not a random choice. The underlying logic is that low gas fees attract more users and trading activity, expanding the ecosystem. When the ecosystem becomes large enough, even if individual transactions don't consume much, the overall token lock-up and demand will increase significantly. This is a long-term strategic trade-off—using low fees to drive ecosystem growth, ultimately leading to an increase in token value.