Address Poisoning Scams Drain Millions as Crypto Attacks Surge

ETH8,4%

Crypto users lost tens of millions of dollars in January to address poisoning and signature phishing scams, as attackers exploited lower transaction costs and user inattention to steal funds at scale.

Scam Sniffer Warns of Spike in Address Poisoning Losses

Crypto wallet scams intensified in January, with address poisoning and signature phishing attacks driving significant losses, according to data from blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer.

In one of the most striking cases, a single victim lost $12.2 million after mistakenly copying a malicious address from their transaction history. The incident followed a similar address poisoning attack in December that resulted in roughly $50 million in losses.

Scam Sniffer reported that address poisoning remains one of the most reliable methods for draining large sums from crypto wallets. Attackers create addresses that match the first and last characters of a trusted wallet, while subtly altering the middle portion, making them difficult to spot at a glance.

Alongside address poisoning, signature phishing attacks also surged in January. Scam Sniffer estimates that $6.27 million was stolen from 4,741 victims through malicious signature requests, marking a 207% increase compared to December. Notably, just two wallets were responsible for 65% of all signature phishing-related losses during the month.

Unlike address poisoning, signature phishing relies on tricking users into signing harmful blockchain transactions, such as granting unlimited token approvals or authorizing fund transfers without realizing the consequences.

Analysts believe the recent rise in attack volume may be partly linked to Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrade, rolled out in December. By reducing transaction costs, the upgrade made it cheaper for attackers to send large numbers of dust transactions, lowering the barrier to running address poisoning campaigns at scale.

Read more: SEC Sounds Alarm as Crypto Scammers Flood Group Chats With AI-Powered Cons

Security firms continue to urge users to double-check wallet addresses, avoid copying addresses from transaction histories, and carefully review signature requests before approving them, as these attack methods show no signs of slowing down.

FAQ 🚨

  • What is address poisoning in crypto?

Scammers send look-alike wallet addresses to trick users into copying the wrong one.

  • How much was lost to these scams in January?

Victims lost tens of millions, including a single $12.2 million address poisoning case.

  • Why did signature phishing spike sharply?

Attackers exploited user inattention, stealing $6.27 million via malicious signatures.

  • What’s driving the rise in these attacks now?

Lower transaction fees made large-scale scam campaigns cheaper and easier to run.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

ZachXBT discloses internal payment server data from North Korean IT workers, involving a $3.5 million flow of funds

On-chain detective ZachXBT revealed that an anonymous source shared stolen data from North Korea’s internal payment servers, involving 390 accounts and encrypted transaction information. More than $3.5 million in funds vanished, and it is connected to a sanctioned company. ZachXBT has compiled a detailed organizational chart.

GateNews30m ago

Adam Back: Bitcoin’s quantum threat is still far off, but the migration window has already opened

Blockstream CEO Adam Back said in an interview that quantum computers have not yet threatened the Bitcoin network, but the industry needs to prepare in advance by migrating keys to a quantum-resistant format. He mentioned that his research team is pushing forward on related work; post-quantum cryptography has already entered the implementation stage. The challenge faced is how to complete the migration in an orderly way.

GateNews45m ago

South Korea takes away exchange discretion in a major anti-phishing crackdown

South Korea's financial regulators have mandated that all domestic crypto exchanges implement a uniform withdrawal delay system to combat voice phishing scams. This decision removes prior flexibility for platforms in managing withdrawal exceptions, aiming to give victims time to reconsider transactions.

CoinDesk3h ago

Is there a connection between it and the Crown Prince Group? While the cryptocurrency resort project in Timor-Leste is moving forward, the construction site is empty and contains nothing.

Timor-Leste’s “cryptocurrency resort” project is believed to be connected to a Cambodian prince group scam network that is subject to U.S. sanctions. On-site investigation found the location to be an empty lot. The prince group has been accused of carrying out large-scale online fraud, with victims worldwide. The investigation prompted concern from the Timor-Leste government, which said the country faces the risk of transnational crime.

CryptoCity3h ago

Argentine President Milei’s call logs link him to multimillion-dollar Libra rug pull: NYT

Newly surfaced phone records and messages are adding to evidence that could deepen legal scrutiny of Argentine President Javier Milei’s role in the failed Libra cryptocurrency project, The New York Times reported Monday. Court documents from an ongoing federal investigation show Milei exchanged

CoinDesk3h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments