Bitcoin has survived 17 years and cannot be compared to tulip bubbles. Eric Balchunas and Garry Krug discuss the reasons why the resilience of crypto is making critics wrong.
Bitcoin keeps making its opponents wrong. The cryptocurrency is trading at an average of about 89,000, although it has experienced volatility in the recent past. Those who draw parallels between it and tulip mania fail to carefully consider an important aspect. Tulips failed after 3 years. Bitcoin has survived almost twenty years.
**You might also like:**Novogratz: $8 Billion Coinbase Valuation Proves Cryptos Are Not Tulips
Why Bitcoin’s Durability Destroys Bubble Narratives
Tulip mania lasted from 1634 to 1637. Prices skyrocketed and crashed by nearly 90 percent. The Dutch economy experienced a speculative boom and bust. It was soon terminated and never came back.
The story of Bitcoin is a different one. The cryptocurrency survived numerous obstacles. It emerged intact from regulatory raids and exchange crashes. Market cycles came and went. Bitcoin continued to recover in a bigger way.
The Asset Critics Love to Hate
Balchunas responded to enduring criticism. There are those who just hate Bitcoin. They desire to make followers angry. These opponents are rewriting old stories, rather than looking into facts.
The performance of Bitcoin says it all. Even a flat 2025 would not take away its course. The cryptocurrency justified itself with recurring rebounds. Such resilience is never exhibited in traditional bubbles.
Krug stressed the youthfulness of Bitcoin as a currency. The previous seventeen years proved something significant. Durability is more important than short-term volatility. Physical resources hold and multiply.
Breaking Free From Misconceptions
The argument of non-productive assets fails, too. Gold doesn’t produce returns. Rare art sits in museums. Bitcoin resembles stores of valuable wealth. It was legitimate by living on, unlike tulips.
Critics defy accumulated evidence. Balchunas observed that the fact that Bitcoin survived is in itself an object of admiration. The Bitcoin endured hardships never witnessed before. No bubble in history displayed such staying power.
The criticism is not perpetuated because it is true, as Krug on X remarks. They have been in place since the recognition of the success of Bitcoin demands challenging realities. Seventeen years of evidence do not support bubble stories.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Why Does Ethereum Price "Rise with Bitcoin but Ignore Fundamentals"? Bitwise Reveals: 65% of Price Movement Determined by Bitcoin
Bitwise's research indicates that Ethereum's price movements are primarily driven by Bitcoin and macroeconomic liquidity, with relatively weak influence from on-chain fundamentals. The model shows that Bitcoin volatility can explain 65% of Ethereum's volatility, while accommodative monetary conditions and ETF fund flows also contribute to Ethereum's price. The current market views Ethereum as a "network commodity," and its price movements in the short term may still be dominated by Bitcoin and the liquidity environment.
GateNews4m ago
Citi significantly lowers Bitcoin and Ethereum target prices, with policy delays constraining upside potential
Citigroup has lowered its 12-month target prices for Bitcoin and Ethereum to $112,000 and $3,175 respectively, mainly due to the slower-than-expected progress of U.S. policy initiatives. Although the target prices have been reduced, both assets still have room for upward movement. The market's diminished expectations for demand growth make the sustainability of capital inflows a critical factor. If regulatory conditions improve, the target prices may be raised; otherwise, the downward adjustment will be justified.
GateNews19m ago
Mainstream CEX and DEX funding rates show the market remains bearish
On March 18, Gate News reported that as Bitcoin dipped slightly, the funding rates across major CEX and DEX platforms show the market is broadly bearish, indicating that market sentiment remains skewed to the downside.
GateNews19m ago
U.S. stocks strengthen but crypto concept stocks diverge, with Bitcoin's high-level fluctuations suppressing the performance of COIN and MSTR
The US stock market rose slightly driven by macroeconomic data and corporate earnings, with investors showing increased risk appetite for equities. Cryptocurrency-related stocks showed mixed performance, with COIN and MSTR trading characteristics closely tied to Bitcoin price fluctuations. Despite overall strength in US equities and rapid capital inflows, crypto stocks will continue to exhibit high volatility if Bitcoin fails to establish a trending rally.
GateNews23m ago
Tim Scott: US Senate Crypto Bill May See Breakthrough, Stablecoin Yield Controversy Enters Critical Stage
US Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott indicated that disagreements regarding stablecoin yield payment provisions could make progress this week, with compromise proposals expected to be received. The bill aims to clarify the US regulatory framework for crypto assets, with ongoing negotiations involving multiple key provisions that, if agreed upon, would have far-reaching implications for the crypto market.
GateNews39m ago
