IMF Issues Report Highlighting Risks of Stablecoins and Advocates for CBDCs

The IMF’s report highlights the risks stablecoins pose to monetary sovereignty and calls for Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) as a solution.

Critics argue that stablecoins offer vital benefits in unstable fiat economies, providing more financial freedom and independence.

The IMF raised concerns over stablecoins’ potential use in illicit activities, but critics argue that similar risks exist with traditional currencies.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has released a report addressing the potential risks of stablecoins and advocating for Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) as a solution. The 56-page document outlines the threats stablecoins pose to monetary sovereignty and financial stability. The IMF’s report echoes concerns voiced by other central banks and international organizations regarding the increasing adoption of stablecoins.

Risks of Stablecoins to Monetary Sovereignty

The IMF’s report warns that stablecoins could undermine the ability of governments to control their monetary policies. The report states that currency substitution enabled by stablecoin use would infringe on a country’s monetary sovereignty. “Central bank money is the most basic, liquid and resilient form of money, and should continue to play its role,” the IMF emphasized in its findings. The IMF further argues that stablecoins could lead to a shift in control over money from governments to the private sector

As a result, central banks could lose their ability to influence domestic monetary conditions. This challenge to governmental control over currency raises concerns about the stability of national economies. In response to the risks posed by stablecoins, the IMF advocates for the development and adoption of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). The IMF suggests that CBDCs could provide a safer, government-controlled alternative to stablecoins

The report highlights that CBDCs could help central banks maintain control over monetary systems while offering digital alternatives to cash. The IMF has stated that central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) would likely provide a more secure method for dealing with electronic currency. Moreover, they would allow central banks to maintain their position in the control of money supply and interest rates. Thus, through limiting the growth of digital currencies, governments would still be able to exert their power over the economies in their countries.

Criticism from Industry Leaders and Concerns About Illicit Activities

The IMF’s stance on stablecoins has sparked criticism from several crypto experts. Industry leaders argue that stablecoins provide essential benefits, especially in economies with unstable fiat currencies. Kevin Lee, Chief Business Officer of Gate, commented, “While central banks rightly focus on stability, we believe the narrative of ‘substitution risk’ misses the bigger picture.”Erbil Karaman, co-founder of Huma.Finance, highlighted that many people in unstable fiat economies rely on stablecoins for financial stability

He argued that stablecoins offer more independence from centralized financial systems. “Centralized policy making and centralized financial systems have failed these people for decades,” Karaman added. The IMF highlighted the issue of stablecoins being possibly used for illicit activities as well. The document mentions that stablecoins’ non-disclosure or anonymity and their low transaction fees could attract criminals to use them for money laundering or even financing terrorism

However, some opponents claim that those traditional currencies, e.g., the US dollar, are also involved in the same issues Although the IMF expressed concerns, other experts believe that using stablecoins for wrong purposes is less likely than with cash, particularly if the right regulations exist. The crypto sector is on the rise, and many are in favor of having regulations that are neither too restrictive nor too lenient, as they would effectively reduce the risks while fostering innovation at the same time.