Mining Revenue Ranking

#比特币# #PoW# In the global financial market, cryptocurrency mining revenue has become a major focus for many investors. Which are the top-yielding mining coins this year that you shouldn’t miss? By comparing the mining revenues of different coins, you’ll uncover the surprising truths of the 2023 mining revenue rankings. How does the accuracy of mining revenue calculation methods impact your strategy? Does mining with a home computer still have potential? This article will comprehensively address these questions to help you steadily increase your returns in a highly competitive market.

The calculation of cryptocurrency mining revenue involves several core variables, and understanding these factors is crucial for investors to develop sound mining strategies. Mining revenue primarily depends on the hash rate of the mining machine—the higher the hash rate, the more computational tasks completed per unit of time, resulting in more block rewards. For example, the Antminer S17+ has a hash rate of 67 Thash/s and a power consumption of 2680W, with a daily revenue of approximately 3.924 yuan, demonstrating the baseline earnings of high-end miners.

In addition to hardware hash rate, electricity cost is another key factor affecting mining revenue. Electricity prices vary greatly by region, ranging from 0.3 yuan to 1.5 yuan per kWh, directly impacting net mining profits. Mining difficulty adjustments also affect earnings in real time; as total network hash rate increases, so does the difficulty, and vice versa. Furthermore, market price fluctuations of cryptocurrencies determine the actual value of block rewards—BTC is currently priced at $92,168.17, making Bitcoin mining more attractive compared to other coins. Mining pool selection also affects final returns, with pool fees ranging from 0% to 3%. Accurate mining revenue calculation methods must account for all these variables to properly evaluate actual return rates.

There is a fundamental difference between mining with home computers and professional mining machines, which determines their respective profit potential. Home computers are typically equipped with consumer-grade graphics cards or CPUs, offering much lower hash rates than professional miners. For example, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 has a mining payback period of up to 98 months, meaning investors would have to wait over 8 years to recoup their initial investment. The advantage of home computer mining is the low initial investment, making it suitable for small-scale testing and learning the basics of mining.

Professional miners like the Antminer S23 Hyd offer 580 Thash of hash rate, and the NiceHash calculator shows a daily income of 0.00025000 BTC (approximately $22.89), far exceeding that of home computers. Although the upfront cost for professional miners is higher, their impressive hash rate significantly shortens the payback period, typically achieving profitability within 6-18 months. For home computer mining, under current difficulty levels, it is difficult to generate substantial income, whereas professional miners can provide a stable positive cash flow. Professional miners also have better energy efficiency, consuming less power for the same period, resulting in higher net profits. Therefore, after careful analysis of mining revenue calculation methods, professional miners are clearly superior to home computers.

Bitcoin, as the world’s largest cryptocurrency by market cap, holds a market share of 58.74% and a total market cap of $1.839 trillion, continuing to be the mainstream choice for mining revenue. According to F2Pool’s PoW ranking data, BTC ranks first among all mineable coins, with a 24-hour output of $41.556 million, reflecting its strength as the highest-yield mining coin. BTC’s block reward is 3.125 coins, with a block interval of 600 seconds, and its relatively stable mining environment makes it the top choice for long-term investors.

Apart from Bitcoin, other PoW coins also offer competitive mining opportunities. Zcash (ZEC), Litecoin (LTC), and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) rank third, fourth, and fifth, respectively, on the F2Pool rankings, each with its own features: LTC uses the Scrypt algorithm and is suited for specific mining machines; ZEC offers privacy protection and has stable market demand; emerging coins like Alephium (ALPH) and Salvium (SAL) provide alternative algorithm options. When comparing mining returns across different coins, price volatility, difficulty changes, and market liquidity should be considered.

The choice of top-yielding mining coins should be based on individual risk tolerance and capital size. Large operators tend to choose BTC and LTC for their strong liquidity and relatively stable difficulty; smaller miners may consider emerging coins like ALPH and SAL, which have lower difficulty and relatively higher returns but greater price volatility. In the 2025 mining environment, multi-coin strategies have become standard for professional miners, allowing them to dynamically shift hash power to the most profitable coins and significantly boost overall returns.

This article provides a detailed discussion of cryptocurrency mining revenue rankings and influencing factors for 2025, offering concrete investment guidance for miners. It analyzes the basic calculation of mining revenue, including miner power consumption, electricity cost, and market price fluctuations, and compares the mining efficiency of home computers and professional miners. The article excludes other exchanges and mainly uses Gate’s data to explore high-yield coin options beyond Bitcoin, making it suitable for both large operators and small miners. This article is especially valuable for investors seeking steady returns in the cryptocurrency field.