2026-01-09 02:28:38

They want you to think AI is just another bubble waiting to pop.

Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs just dropped hard data: 78% of customer service positions are replaceable right now. Not sometime down the road. Today.

Here's the thing though—the same voices dismissing AI as overhyped? They're the ones who'll be scrambling when the market actually shifts. The gap between hype and reality is closing faster than anyone thought. Financial institutions aren't betting on a crash. They're positioning for disruption.

The real question isn't whether AI is overvalued. It's whether you're ready for what comes next.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainDetective

· 15h ago

78% of customer service positions are gone, there's really no way to avoid this wave anymore.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBarbecue

· 01-10 05:32

78% directly replaced? I don't believe you, brother. How did you calculate this data? --- Here comes the usual "You're not prepared" marketing spiel... Really? --- Goldman Sachs says it can be replaced if it can be replaced? Then why hasn't their customer service team laid off staff? --- Alright, I admit it. Not using AI now does feel a bit panic-inducing. --- That's why I'm still stockpiling these tokens, betting that what they say is true. --- Wait, 78% of jobs disappeared. What about GDP? This logic is a bit flawed. --- Got it, it's another "get in early" soft promotion... but I still believe it. --- I just want to know who will do the remaining 22%... Could it be us? --- Can we really take Goldman Sachs' words seriously? They said last year that the economy was fine. --- Hmm... It really feels like we need to move now. Can't wait any longer.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsShaman

· 01-09 13:16

78% direct replacement? I don't believe you, let's talk about it later.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerGas

· 01-09 02:58

78%? This data needs to be verified through on-chain activity to be credible. I have always been skeptical of Goldman Sachs' reports. Just blindly trusting institutional narratives is not as good as observing the real position changes of those big funds.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 01-09 02:57

78%? Damn, this data is a bit scary. Is it real?

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_vibing

· 01-09 02:57

78%? I'm speechless. If this data is true, a lot of people should start feeling anxious.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 01-09 02:55

78% of customer service can be replaced? Goldman Sachs, this data really can't hold up anymore...