Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Logic Defeated Intuition: How Marilyn vos Savant Changed Our Understanding of Probabilities
When Marilyn vos Savant answered the famous Monty Hall problem in 1990, she didn’t anticipate that her response would cause such a stir in the scientific community. Possessing an unprecedented IQ of 228, she faced a wave of criticism, even from those who seemingly should have understood probability theory better than anyone else.
When 1000 doctors were wrong: the story of the Monty Hall problem
The essence of the problem is simple: a participant chooses one of three doors, behind one of which is a prize, and behind the other two are goats. After the initial choice, the host opens one of the remaining doors, revealing a goat. The participant is then offered the chance to switch doors. At first glance, the odds seem to remain equal — 50/50. However, Marilyn vos Savant insisted otherwise.
Her answer was unequivocal: “Yes, you should switch doors.” Parade Magazine received over 10,000 letters, nearly a thousand of which came from PhD holders, researchers, and mathematicians. The vast majority insisted she was wrong. 90% of critics claimed that the probability of winning remained 50%, regardless of whether the participant switches or not. But the critics were mistaken.
How MIT and MythBusters confirmed the correctness: mathematics versus intuition
A true understanding of this problem requires stepping away from intuitive thinking. When you first choose a door, the probability that the prize is behind it is exactly 1/3. The probability that the prize is behind one of the other two doors is 2/3. When the host opens a door with a goat, he does not change these probabilities — he simply eliminates one of the wrong options. If you switch doors, you move from the 1/3 probability to the 2/3 probability.
This seemed incredible to many, but the scientific community did not stay on the sidelines. Computer simulations conducted at MIT replicated the problem millions of times and confirmed Marilyn vos Savant’s calculations. When the popular TV show MythBusters tested this hypothesis experimentally, the results again confirmed her correctness: switching doors indeed increases the chance of winning to 2/3.
Marilyn vos Savant’s journey: from rare talent to scientific authority
Marilyn vos Savant’s story did not begin in academic circles. Despite her extraordinary intelligence, she faced serious life challenges. In her youth, she had to leave the University of Washington to help with her family’s business. However, this did not prevent her from realizing her potential. Starting in 1985, she began writing the column “Ask Marilyn” in Parade Magazine, where she answered readers’ questions about logic, mathematics, and philosophy.
When intuition misleads even experts: the legacy of the Monty Hall problem
The case of the Monty Hall problem vividly demonstrated an important principle: even the most educated people can be misled by intuition. The dissonance between what “seems right” and what is “actually right” revealed the fragility of our logical instincts. Marilyn vos Savant not only proved her point but also helped the mathematical community reconsider how far cognitive biases can go.
Today, the Monty Hall problem remains a classic example in probability theory, taught in universities, and used to illustrate the paradox between intuition and logic. Her solution, championed by Marilyn vos Savant against a wave of skepticism, has become a symbol of the triumph of mathematical rigor over everyday assumptions.