5 Mafia apps are already live, and the KPI trigger is 10. TGE could come sooner than expected. But the chain isn't ready. I dug into the metrics, CT sentiment, and bridge UX, and the gaps are hard to ignore. — 1. Bridge UX Is Costing Users The USDm model is great. But it requires near 1:1 peg and effortless UX. The Rabbithole portal pushes Bungee as "Best for USDm," but it's actually not. Users can save $50+ on a $100k bridge by switching to LiFi, which is listed as a secondary option. Whales won't bridge to MegaETH if they're eating $50+ in unnecessary costs just to get in. — 2. KPI Reality Check MegaETH tied TGE to one of three triggers. The most likely one: 10 live Megamafia apps. Cap, Kumbaya, Showdown, Avon, and Ubitel are live (5/10). Supernova, Euphoria, and Blackhaven are coming. But CT is overall quiet about all of them, and I'm not sure the products alone are enough to attract real users. — 3. The Incentive Gap Launching with KPI triggers is a double-edged sword. You want a growth flywheel, but you risk a down spiral instead. Everything in crypto is driven by incentives. Think of Blast L2. People farmed and deposited on native protocols because the gold system gave them something to expect. There was a reason to show up. Quality projects alone won't attract users to kickstart this flywheel anymore. Neither will the old points playbook. This is the biggest gap MegaETH needs to solve before passing any KPI and launching TGE. Without a clear incentive layer, hitting 10 live apps doesn't mean 10 apps with users.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
We're not ready for MEGA TGE.
5 Mafia apps are already live, and the KPI trigger is 10. TGE could come sooner than expected.
But the chain isn't ready. I dug into the metrics, CT sentiment, and bridge UX, and the gaps are hard to ignore.
— 1. Bridge UX Is Costing Users
The USDm model is great. But it requires near 1:1 peg and effortless UX.
The Rabbithole portal pushes Bungee as "Best for USDm," but it's actually not. Users can save $50+ on a $100k bridge by switching to LiFi, which is listed as a secondary option.
Whales won't bridge to MegaETH if they're eating $50+ in unnecessary costs just to get in.
— 2. KPI Reality Check
MegaETH tied TGE to one of three triggers. The most likely one: 10 live Megamafia apps.
Cap, Kumbaya, Showdown, Avon, and Ubitel are live (5/10). Supernova, Euphoria, and Blackhaven are coming. But CT is overall quiet about all of them, and I'm not sure the products alone are enough to attract real users.
— 3. The Incentive Gap
Launching with KPI triggers is a double-edged sword. You want a growth flywheel, but you risk a down spiral instead. Everything in crypto is driven by incentives.
Think of Blast L2. People farmed and deposited on native protocols because the gold system gave them something to expect. There was a reason to show up.
Quality projects alone won't attract users to kickstart this flywheel anymore. Neither will the old points playbook.
This is the biggest gap MegaETH needs to solve before passing any KPI and launching TGE.
Without a clear incentive layer, hitting 10 live apps doesn't mean 10 apps with users.