Robert Kiyosaki Silences All Criticism with His Bitcoin Journey

Robert Kiyosaki has spoken out about the allegations claiming he lied about his Bitcoin purchase history. On February 8, Kiyosaki defended his previous Bitcoin purchase timeline on social media, asserting that these dates are not important.
He emphasized that what truly matters is the long-term asset value. Famous for encouraging his followers to embrace digital assets, Kiyosaki reiterated that his investment philosophy is built on an asset accumulation strategy.
The Controversy and Defense Regarding the $6,000 Amount
Kiyosaki’s recent statement about stopping Bitcoin purchases at $6,000 has sparked intense debate among investors. Critics pointed out his earlier calls to “continue buying” even when Bitcoin reached $90,000 and $100,000, claiming these statements are contradictory. His comments faced backlash on social media, with accusations of deceiving the public through community notes and user comments.
In response to these allegations, Kiyosaki clarified that the $6,000 figure mentioned is not the purchase date but merely a “target price” in his mind. He questioned the obsession of critics with specific dates, explaining that investment success depends more on outcomes than on timing. He stated he would not hesitate to buy if Bitcoin drops to $6,000, emphasizing focusing on the amount of assets rather than speculation.
2026 Goals and Asset Diversification
Despite accusations of inconsistency, Kiyosaki continues to hold a firm stance on Bitcoin, gold, and silver. Citing the sharp increase in US national debt and currency devaluation, he reiterated his astonishing predictions for 2026. This financial figure announced targets of $250,000 for Bitcoin, $27,000 per ounce for gold, and $200 for silver, supporting the use of these assets as shields against economic instability, calling them “real money.”
Kiyosaki advocates investing not only in Bitcoin but also in tangible sectors such as real estate and energy, believing that this is the only way to preserve wealth. Although some of his previous warnings about a “market collapse” did not materialize, he views market downturns as important buying opportunities rather than disasters. Describing the current debate as a difference in investment philosophy, he shifted focus to avoiding risks associated with the fiat monetary system and increasing investments in tangible assets.