Big banks vs. politics heats up again. A high-profile figure recently slammed JPMorgan, claiming the institution severed ties after January 6, and now legal action is being planned within two weeks. But here's where it gets messy—the Wall Street Journal published a story suggesting he was offered a government role at the bank's helm. He's pushing back hard, calling the report false. The whole situation highlights the ongoing tension between traditional finance and political figures, raising questions about banking policies and deplatforming practices in the financial sector. This kind of institutional friction has become a flashpoint in broader debates about financial access and corporate independence.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugDocScientist
· 11h ago
Ha, this plot twist is quite incredible... One says they got cut, the other says it didn't happen. Who the heck is lying?
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCat
· 11h ago
Really a big show, JPM's move this time is truly disappointing. Financial giants are going against politicians, and no one wants to let the other side win.
View OriginalReply0
ThreeHornBlasts
· 11h ago
Are you kidding? JPMorgan said cut, then turned around and said they'll arrange a branch manager position for him? Who believes this logic?
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteran
· 11h ago
Here we go again? The big banks and politicians' drama never ends, JPMorgan is really ruthless this time
---
Talking about deplatforming, basically taking sides, haha
---
Lawsuits within two weeks? This script is well-written, looking forward to the show
---
That WSJ article definitely has some tricks, I'm tired of this blame-shifting game
---
So who is really lying? Or is everyone just playing power games
---
That's why we need DeFi; traditional finance is just like this
---
The crackdown started after January 6, and it's still ongoing...
---
Bank politicization, really outrageous, no wonder everyone is running to crypto
---
Government role at the bank's helm? Uh, isn't this just naked trading?
---
Don't talk about corporate independence; capital has long been intertwined with power
Big banks vs. politics heats up again. A high-profile figure recently slammed JPMorgan, claiming the institution severed ties after January 6, and now legal action is being planned within two weeks. But here's where it gets messy—the Wall Street Journal published a story suggesting he was offered a government role at the bank's helm. He's pushing back hard, calling the report false. The whole situation highlights the ongoing tension between traditional finance and political figures, raising questions about banking policies and deplatforming practices in the financial sector. This kind of institutional friction has become a flashpoint in broader debates about financial access and corporate independence.