Recent statements have made it crystal clear: no personal profits from the token in question, and definitely no mishandling of investor capital. The narrative floating around? All debunked—unsupported speculation without a shred of evidence backing it up.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PanicSeller
· 4h ago
Stop with this routine and shifting the blame to market sentiment again?
View OriginalReply0
BtcDailyResearcher
· 4h ago
You're just trying to clear your name again. No matter how nicely you put it, it can't change people's doubts.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 4h ago
Uh... doing this again? Where's the evidence, brother?
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMaker
· 4h ago
Another clarification? It sounds more and more suspicious. Who can tell the truth from lies?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntress
· 4h ago
Well, no matter how eloquently you speak, you have to look at on-chain data. Who would believe just words without any proof?
View OriginalReply0
EthMaximalist
· 4h ago
Well said, someone finally explained this clearly. As for those people spreading rumors everywhere, they really should provide some evidence.
Recent statements have made it crystal clear: no personal profits from the token in question, and definitely no mishandling of investor capital. The narrative floating around? All debunked—unsupported speculation without a shred of evidence backing it up.