The complete transparency of on-chain ledgers is a double-edged sword. Account balances and transaction details are crystal clear, and the impact on privacy is obvious—both individuals and institutions have nowhere to hide.
This is obviously not ideal. But conversely, if one extreme pursues privacy and completely hides transaction information, it seems to solve the problem, but in fact, it also introduces new risks. A few people might exploit this absolute anonymity to conduct illegal activities, undermining the balance of the entire system.
So ultimately, the privacy issue in blockchain is stuck in this dilemma: openness or concealment? Transparency or protection? How to find that line between the two is the real test.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
YieldFarmRefugee
· 3h ago
Honestly, this is a dead end. Transparency eliminates privacy, and if privacy is too strong, it becomes easy for money laundering to exploit loopholes. There really is no perfect solution.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoy
· 3h ago
Basically, it's a matter of not being able to have both fish and bear paws at the same time. There's no perfect solution.
If it's transparent, privacy is gone; if it's private, there's fear of hackers causing trouble. It's really annoying.
In the past two years, watching various privacy coin approaches, I feel there should be a third way.
View OriginalReply0
BakedCatFanboy
· 3h ago
This is the current deadlock; no matter which option you choose, you're stuck.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_trauma
· 3h ago
It's really a case of not being able to have both fish and bear paws... But on the other hand, why are all those privacy coins being delisted by exchanges now? It seems that strict regulation is the real "dilemma."
The complete transparency of on-chain ledgers is a double-edged sword. Account balances and transaction details are crystal clear, and the impact on privacy is obvious—both individuals and institutions have nowhere to hide.
This is obviously not ideal. But conversely, if one extreme pursues privacy and completely hides transaction information, it seems to solve the problem, but in fact, it also introduces new risks. A few people might exploit this absolute anonymity to conduct illegal activities, undermining the balance of the entire system.
So ultimately, the privacy issue in blockchain is stuck in this dilemma: openness or concealment? Transparency or protection? How to find that line between the two is the real test.