2026-01-14 01:50:39

I recently came across an annual summary of a leading project in the prediction market field, and there are a few details worth pondering.

Last year, they experienced a risk event where the oracle was polluted. The project did not choose to pass the blame or make users bear the losses themselves; instead, they directly handled compensation. This kind of attitude is actually rare in the industry.

More importantly, their strategic approach this year is noteworthy. On one hand, they are building a complete ecosystem around their main product, allowing more derivative products to connect and radiate out. On the other hand, they have not evolved into a pure casino-like platform like some competitors, but instead maintained their unique product logic and operational rhythm—steady and cautious, not rushing for quick gains.

This differentiation in positioning is quite obvious. They prioritize user trust while expanding their ecosystem in a measured and planned manner. Such an approach may be more conducive to accumulating long-term users.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeadTrades_Walking

· 8h ago

Bro, this move is really meticulous. Not many projects are willing to pay out directly now; most are just passing the buck left and right. This steady and cautious approach is much better than those rushing to turn into casinos. In the long run, it can still build up popularity.

View OriginalReply0

Rugpull幸存者

· 8h ago

Haha, this project is indeed a bit different. The proactive compensation operation is quite rare, most are just passing the buck like crazy. The steady approach of not monetizing and focusing on the ecosystem sounds very healthy, but just surviving until now already means winning more than half the battle. But on the other hand, can this restrained style attract long-term players? It all depends on whether they can really deliver something in the future. After integrating more ecosystems, will they start to do those flashy and fancy things again? Let's wait and see. Rather than saying it's a differentiation, it's more about living more calmly. Anyway, I have a high regard for projects that have survived several waves. I'm just worried this is the calm before the storm, and there will be another big show then. The compensation aspect is a plus, at least their attitude is acceptable. Although trust is easy to talk about but hard to maintain, and it's deadly.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 8h ago

Direct compensation? That's really a rare species in the crypto world; most are still passing the buck.

View OriginalReply0

GhostInTheChain

· 9h ago

Honestly, this attitude is indeed rare; most are just lousy projects passing the buck.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXM

· 9h ago

Oh wow, this is truly a trustworthy project. I was completely amazed by the compensation wave.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysQuestioning

· 9h ago

Steady and reliable progress is truly rare. Most projects have long been chasing quick money, but this one hasn't been blinded by capital and is still somewhat interesting.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 9h ago

Oh no, this is what should be done—pay directly without passing the buck. Truly rare integrity in the industry.

View OriginalReply0