2026-01-12 15:35:10

Algorithmic Overkill in System Moderation

When platforms struggle to distinguish genuine activity from bot behavior, they often resort to blunt suppression tactics. The problem? Legitimate, high-performing accounts end up collateral damage.

Instead of precise filtering, the system lumps quality signals together with noise. Real engagement gets throttled alongside spam, creating a false equivalence that punishes honest users. It's efficiency at the expense of accuracy—a trade-off that erodes trust in platform reliability.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RuntimeError

· 11h ago

This is probably the reason why I was recently limited in reach, so speechless. --- The algorithm is so brutal, treating us all like trash. --- It's that same "for safety" excuse, but actually just laziness. --- Has anyone else experienced inexplicable suppression of their popularity like me? --- If precise targeting can't be done well, just cut it all off; anyway, users have no way to fight back. --- This is an issue that Web3 platforms also have to face; no one can escape. --- Efficiency > accuracy; anyway, only small accounts are mistakenly targeted, right? --- So true, high-quality accounts are actually targeted the most harshly.

View OriginalReply0

quiet_lurker

· 01-12 23:50

This algorithm really kills good people alive. I don't understand what precision means, and then it starts killing randomly.

View OriginalReply0

HodlAndChill

· 01-12 16:05

Algorithms are just swinging wildly, cutting good accounts as well, it's outrageous. --- The platform's review mechanism is a mess, truly active users are instead suppressed as if they were bots. --- That's why I have no trust in any platform now. When you can't tell the trash from the good, you just lump everyone together—typical lazy thinking. --- The accuracy is completely broken. The result of prioritizing efficiency is treating all genuine users as trash to be cleaned. --- Misjudging high-performance accounts is too common. The platform simply doesn't want to spend effort on fine-grained management and just cuts everything indiscriminately. --- Basically, the algorithm is too bad. It just bans both good and bad accounts together, since ordinary users can't really complain anyway. --- The most ironic part of this mechanism is that—designed to prevent cheating—it actually creates more distrust. --- Damn, why do high-quality accounts always end up affecting us normal users? The platform just wants to cut corners.

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizeMe

· 01-12 16:04

This algorithm is too destructive, the knife has no eyes. --- Really wiping out everything, mixing good accounts and trash in one pot. --- It's outrageous. My account was mistakenly banned, and the platform's excuse is just laziness and lack of refinement. --- To cut corners, they directly implement large-scale bans, turning users into sacrificial victims. --- This is the core issue that Web3 should address. Centralized algorithms will never outperform users. --- Can’t precision and efficiency be achieved at the same time? Then I choose decentralization. --- Face-slapping moment, once again efficiency is prioritized and humans are treated as the cost.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter

· 01-12 15:57

nah this is exactly how protocols die... devs just blast everything with the hammer instead of reading the actual mempool signals. seen this play out too many times on chain

Reply0

TokenVelocity

· 01-12 15:53

What kind of review is this? Mixing high-quality content with spam, the algorithm really sucks.

View OriginalReply0