2026-01-12 05:22:02

Recently, I have delved into various privacy solutions and the design ideas of new chains. I must say, the concepts behind certain privacy coins have truly attracted me.

I used to believe that on-chain transparency was justice; only by exposing all transactions to the sunlight could fairness be ensured. But after actually making transactions and running various strategies, you realize things are not that simple—every trade you make, your position size, and timing are all monitored, making it easy for opponents to infer your strategic intentions from on-chain data. This feeling of being constantly watched is honestly quite uncomfortable.

It was at this point that I began to understand why so many developers are researching privacy protocols. Transparency is important, but personal transaction privacy also deserves protection. This is not about doing evil, but a genuine need. The emergence of new chains, including iterations of various privacy technologies, in a way, are all trying to find a balance between these two aspects.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SandwichTrader

· 18h ago

Ah, you hit the nail on the head. The feeling of having your on-chain data exposed by others is truly suffocating. --- What’s the point of transparency? My wallet is monitored by hundreds of bots, and before I can even execute a strategy, it’s already been front-run. --- This guy gets it. Privacy isn’t about tax evasion; it’s a basic human right. --- Someone should have said this a long time ago. Honestly, those shouting about fairness haven’t even been educated by MEV. --- Wait, why are privacy coins still being criticized? Why isn’t anyone speaking up for developers? --- To be honest, investing is like playing poker. If your entire hand is exposed, how can you play? --- Finding a balance is easy to say but hard to implement, brother. --- The Sand Coin Regulatory Bureau hates this the most. --- Got it, got it. Every one of my transactions is being studied as a textbook example.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCrazyGF

· 18h ago

Haha, okay, finally someone said it. Before, it was all about transparency teaching me how to be a person. Being exposed and having data leaked really feels uncomfortable, like naked trading on an exchange. Privacy coins are indeed necessary, otherwise the actions of big players can be read like mind-reading. Balancing this is easier to talk about than to do, my friends.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 18h ago

Transparency is a double-edged sword. The feeling of being monitored is indeed suffocating, I understand. That's why privacy coins will always have a market—who can tolerate being watched while trading? You're right, the on-chain panoramic view is too unfriendly to retail investors; large investors can easily see through you and expose you. It’s coming back to me, so the reason those privacy protocols are so popular is not just the technology itself, but more about this urgent pain point. But to be honest, when will the tug-of-war between privacy and regulation truly find a balance?

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 19h ago

The feeling of players repeatedly reading on-chain data is truly amazing.

View OriginalReply0

ChainBrain

· 19h ago

Haha, only when being repeatedly exploited do you understand what privacy really means. Trading counterparts watch your wallet just like they watch their prey.

View OriginalReply0