Got another one on the radar—$FWOG. Though I scan plenty of chart patterns, I'm selective about what actually warrants attention. Here's what I look for when hunting bottoms:
First, the chart needs to genuinely *look* bottomed—no ambiguity there. Second, you want real buying interest clustering around specific price levels, not just a constant free fall. And third—this matters—there's gotta be momentum suggesting an upside move is brewing.
Most importantly, those conditions need to align. That's when you get a setup worth tracking.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 01-14 22:02
Bottom judgment: I've heard this kind of rhetoric too many times. The key is whether the trading volume can truly keep up; otherwise, it's a false bottom, and once the risk control threshold is broken, it will immediately trigger a chain of liquidations.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller
· 01-14 04:34
Wow, this is the correct way to scientifically select coins. I also really dislike those who stubbornly hold onto a single coin without letting go. Your selective scanning approach makes sense. I have deep experience with bottom resonance; only act when all three conditions align, otherwise it's a suicidal bottom-fishing attempt.
View OriginalReply0
SatsStacking
· 01-13 16:05
ngl, it's really hard for these three conditions to occur simultaneously. Most of the time, it's just an illusion.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperer
· 01-12 04:53
I also believe in the bottom confirmation, but can FWOG really align? It seems like the buying orders are still quite scattered.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBro
· 01-12 04:52
I'm also checking the bottom confirmation part, just worried about fake bottoms being repeatedly smashed, wasting all the money.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 01-12 04:51
NGL, this theory sounds good, but the chances to truly align are painfully few...
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfession
· 01-12 04:48
Honestly, I've heard this theory many times, but the key still depends on execution. Very few can truly hit that point.
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMiner
· 01-12 04:48
To be honest, I'm tired of this bottom confirmation argument. The ones that can really make money are actually not that complicated.
View OriginalReply0
MagicBean
· 01-12 04:36
ngl, this guy's right. The bottom really requires several conditions to come together to be reliable; just looking at the chart isn't enough.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGriller
· 01-12 04:27
Reasonable and well-founded, but looks like it's oscillating at the bottom, can it really go up?
Got another one on the radar—$FWOG. Though I scan plenty of chart patterns, I'm selective about what actually warrants attention. Here's what I look for when hunting bottoms:
First, the chart needs to genuinely *look* bottomed—no ambiguity there. Second, you want real buying interest clustering around specific price levels, not just a constant free fall. And third—this matters—there's gotta be momentum suggesting an upside move is brewing.
Most importantly, those conditions need to align. That's when you get a setup worth tracking.