Interesting take on international fund transfers: if massive outflows are happening, it either signals excess capital or suggests coordinated movement that warrants scrutiny. The oversight angle here touches on a real debate in the crypto space—how do regulators balance monitoring large cross-border transactions while respecting financial sovereignty? This kind of comment reflects broader concerns about capital flight detection and the tension between compliance and privacy in global markets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoTarotReader
· 14h ago
Regulation and privacy, these two arch-enemies, never end... Once large cross-border transfers are targeted, compliance becomes just a facade.
View OriginalReply0
ponzi_poet
· 16h ago
Large funds moving away or just normal liquidity flow—this issue, frankly, is a deadlock between regulation and privacy...
View OriginalReply0
ForkMaster
· 01-12 04:02
Large cross-border transfers really put regulators in a dilemma—on one hand, they need to prevent capital outflows, and on the other hand, they must respect financial autonomy—basically the classic dilemma of choosing between the fish and the bear's paw. But I think, those truly big players have long mastered the art of vulnerability auditing, and smart contract code is the right path. Raising three kids over the past few years has made me much more sensitive to capital flows. To be honest, I've seen quite a few projects use "coordinated transfers" tricks, mainly to evade regulatory scrutiny.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 01-12 04:02
Really, regulation and privacy will always be a deadlock when it comes to large cross-border transfers.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpy
· 01-12 04:00
Large capital outflows are essentially an eternal battle between regulation and freedom... I really can't understand why people always think that large cross-border transactions are money laundering.
Interesting take on international fund transfers: if massive outflows are happening, it either signals excess capital or suggests coordinated movement that warrants scrutiny. The oversight angle here touches on a real debate in the crypto space—how do regulators balance monitoring large cross-border transactions while respecting financial sovereignty? This kind of comment reflects broader concerns about capital flight detection and the tension between compliance and privacy in global markets.