Let's take a look at the market again. This time, I want to discuss the possibility of a certain coin reaching 0.1.



To be honest, calling price targets is easy, but I want to support this judgment with a specific logical framework. After all, coins that can multiply several times are backed by multiple conditions being met simultaneously, not just guesswork.

**First: The position is already extremely low**

Currently, this coin has been oscillating at the bottom range for a long time, with trading volume shrinking to a clearly visible extent. The phenomenon you can observe is—no one is paying attention, and no one is anxiously cutting losses. This state almost always signals a period of accumulation in history.

From the chart structure, once it breaks through the previous resistance high point and confirms with increased volume, the selling pressure above is not dense. Reaching the 0.1 price level is essentially a natural space resulting from the resonance of sentiment and trend, not just a figment of imagination.

**Second: Low-level chips are quietly being absorbed**

The phenomena observable on-chain and in order book data are very clear—bottom chips are slowly consolidating, retail floating chips are decreasing, but the price has not been broken down. What does this indicate? Selling pressure is gradually weakening.

True upward movement never starts at the most frantic, euphoric market moments. On the contrary, it happens during phases when you ask yourself every day, "Why isn’t it going up yet?" Turnover happens slowly when you have the least patience.

**Third: The narrative is still alive, but the price is on the floor**

This project is not purely an air coin. It still remains on the main track of the current market—whether it's AI, infrastructure, Meme, or application layer, it occupies a certain position.

The key mismatch appears here: the narrative is still alive, and funds are still cycling within that sector, but the coin’s price is on the ground. Once the overall market sentiment warms up, the most natural choice for funds is to sweep into these "cost-effective targets," rather than those that have already multiplied several times.

**Fourth: 0.1 is a meaningful psychological level**

The number 0.1 is not casually shouted out. It usually signifies several phenomena occurring simultaneously:

- Market cap entering the mainstream view

- Key industry opinion leaders beginning to discuss it intensively

- Ordinary retail investors’ FOMO emotions fully ignited

Looking at historical patterns, many coins’ main upward waves actually occur in the range of "no one believes → everyone asks if they can still buy in." From indifference to frenzy, the only thing in between is often just a price breakthrough.

**Fifth: The odds are worth waiting for**

Buying at this position, the downside space is actually limited—the bottom structure is in place, and stop-loss points are clear.

But if the trend is confirmed to go up, the return at the 0.1 price level is not a small 10% or 20%, but a multiple of expectations.

This kind of risk-reward ratio truly makes it worth patiently waiting.

**Back to the initial question**

I am bullish not because I simply believe it can reach 0.1, but because the dimensions of position, chips, narrative, market sentiment, and risk-reward ratio are all pointing in the same direction.

As long as the trend truly emerges, 0.1 will not be a fantasy, but a reasonable target based on logical foundations.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
liquidation_watchervip
· 10h ago
I've heard quite a bit about the argument that chips are concentrated at the bottom, but let's see if it can really break the level.
View OriginalReply0
PonziWhisperervip
· 10h ago
It's the same old story again, bottom chips, emotional resonance... I've heard it too many times.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTrainingvip
· 10h ago
Sounds quite solid logically; the chips, narrative, and odds all line up.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBrokenPromisevip
· 10h ago
Here we go again, talking about chips, narratives, odds... sounds pretty right, but honestly it's just betting on the trend. --- I've heard the low-position accumulation theory too many times; sometimes no one really wants it. --- 0.1 definitely offers high cost-performance, but bottom structure is something only hindsight can easily see. --- I just want to know if this coin has real application; just talking about narratives feels a bit empty. --- Odds are indeed tempting, but how many are really willing to go all in? --- Is the signal of declining selling pressure reliable? Feels like it's always said at the bottom. --- The turnover completed when there's no patience... I'm that retail investor who sold out impatiently. --- The logical framework sounds good, but history doesn't necessarily repeat itself. --- I believe 0.1 is a psychological level, but psychological levels are often the easiest to break repeatedly. --- The main upward wave shifts from indifference to frenzy; perhaps what's in between isn't price breakout, but running away.
View OriginalReply0
GasGrillMastervip
· 10h ago
Concentrated chips, the narrative is still alive, this logic indeed holds water. Big brother's analysis is spot on, just waiting for the moment of breakdown. This odds are really tempting, patience is key. Those who buy at the bottom will laugh last. 0.1 is not a dream, the question is when will it break. Well said, I am also waiting for this signal. Indeed, high-cost performance assets are always swept up last.
View OriginalReply0
BakedCatFanboyvip
· 11h ago
Now I somewhat understand why I couldn't understand the market all along; it turns out this is called the accumulation phase.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)