Look, it makes sense why management has been restructuring the platform this aggressively. When the acquisition closed, the business was bleeding—we're talking nine-figure annual losses. That's a massive hole to plug.
Every major pivot since then has been laser-focused on fixing the financials. Workforce reductions, premium subscription rollouts, ad revenue optimization—these aren't random moves. They're textbook turnaround strategies.
Yes, the algorithm changes have been controversial in crypto circles. But here's the thing: you can't ignore balance sheets. Whether you agree with the execution or not, the underlying logic is straightforward. When you inherit a business hemorrhaging that much capital, you have limited options. Cut costs, diversify revenue streams, improve unit economics.
The platform needed to become profitable. That was always going to require difficult decisions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroEnjoyer
· 1h ago
To be honest, a nine-figure loss is right there, and not implementing more aggressive reforms might actually be problematic... It’s just that the execution really hurts.
View OriginalReply0
BakedCatFanboy
· 3h ago
To be honest, I think there's nothing wrong with this logic... but the real situation might be more complicated than what the article describes.
View OriginalReply0
PumpAnalyst
· 14h ago
Nine-digit loss, this is indeed no joke. But the problem is, this set of tactics to cut leek is a bit too obvious, right?
---
In simple terms, if the books look good, user experience will suffer. I just want to know how long this wave of operations can last.
---
The technical aspect has already collapsed; now it's about whether we can pull up new revenue support levels. Risk control recommendations still need to be well implemented.
---
Attention everyone, is management really building a bottom or are they really going to cool off? Data speaks, monthly active users and retention rate are key.
---
I'm not trying to be pessimistic, but this reason of "profiting" is too perfect. This is what the market makers love to say the most.
---
The balance sheet looks good, but the ecosystem has actually lost half of its vitality. Is this deal worth it? I really don't know.
---
I remain bearish, but if it can truly turn from loss to profit, this rebound does have some substance. The key is how Q3 data turns out.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMe
· 01-11 22:53
In plain terms, no one can withstand spending so much money; a tough operation is necessary.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteran
· 01-11 22:51
Honestly, I can understand the management's move this time. Taking over a mess, everyone has to be ruthless. But I just want to ask—can these decisions really save this game now?
---
Getting used to cutting leeks, now it's our own people being cut.
---
The balance sheet looks better, but what about user experience? Anyway, I’ve left.
---
NGL, this is a typical "amputation to save life." The problem is, after cutting off the leg, can it still run?
---
Nine-figure loss... Good grief, how many people need to be cut to fill this gap?
---
So basically, it's out of money, everything is just to survive.
---
I'll just see how long this premium strategy can last. Anyway, the era of high fees should be coming to an end.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologist
· 01-11 22:37
To be honest, I knew it was time to cut losses when it hit nine figures. Nothing surprising about that.
The crypto world is chaotic, but financial reports are something you can't run away from when they're right in front of you.
Layoffs, subscriptions, advertising... this combination isn't actually a problem; it's just the way it's executed that feels off.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694b
· 01-11 22:35
Basically, it's about staying alive. Who can handle a nine-figure loss?
Look, it makes sense why management has been restructuring the platform this aggressively. When the acquisition closed, the business was bleeding—we're talking nine-figure annual losses. That's a massive hole to plug.
Every major pivot since then has been laser-focused on fixing the financials. Workforce reductions, premium subscription rollouts, ad revenue optimization—these aren't random moves. They're textbook turnaround strategies.
Yes, the algorithm changes have been controversial in crypto circles. But here's the thing: you can't ignore balance sheets. Whether you agree with the execution or not, the underlying logic is straightforward. When you inherit a business hemorrhaging that much capital, you have limited options. Cut costs, diversify revenue streams, improve unit economics.
The platform needed to become profitable. That was always going to require difficult decisions.