2026-01-11 09:46:17

Wow, it took me a while to decide to enter the market, and as soon as I did, I got smashed. The market didn't move as expected, so I cut my losses decisively and lost over 600U. This experience has been a lesson—paying the price for chasing highs is really costly. It seems I need to wait for more stable signals before taking action.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseHobo

· 01-13 01:26

Chasing highs is really the most money-burning course in this circle; a tuition of 600U is still considered cheap, haha.

View OriginalReply0

TokenToaster

· 01-11 10:44

Chasing highs is really a common topic; we still need to learn from the lessons.

View OriginalReply0

GasWrangler

· 01-11 10:16

nah see this is exactly what happens when you don't analyze the actual mempool data before entry. technically speaking, if you'd tracked the priority fee differential and transaction throughput patterns, the liquidation cascade was demonstrably predictable. $600 loss? that's the cost of sub-optimal timing strategy tbh

Reply0

BearEatsAll

· 01-11 10:15

Stop loss at 600U, this tuition fee was worth it, at least I didn't hold on stubbornly until it went to the moon. The real test is whether I can resist chasing highs next time.

View OriginalReply0

YieldWhisperer