2026-01-11 01:26:51

Wrapping equities in tokens doesn't solve the core problem—it just replicates what stablecoins do: packaging fiat under a different wrapper. That's structurally fragile.

Stock tokenization needs something more radical. Simply layering blockchain onto traditional equity isn't innovation; it's lipstick on a pig. Without fundamentally rethinking how company ownership is represented and transferred on-chain, we're just creating another vector for inflationary pressure.

The real question: can tokenized stocks be anything more than a cosmetic upgrade? Or will they inevitably inherit the same instability that dogs the stablecoin ecosystem?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

27 Likes

Reward
27
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCryer

· 01-14 00:47

Another pseudo-innovation dressed in blockchain attire. I've said it before, this stuff is nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekMaster

· 01-14 00:11

No problem with that, the trick of wrapping and packaging is really getting tiresome. Just change the name and run away, while the underlying issues remain unresolved.

View OriginalReply0

mev_me_maybe

· 01-13 22:23

It's the same old trick again; changing the disguise still leads to failure.

View OriginalReply0

memecoin_therapy

· 01-13 02:07

Basically, it's just a different disguise to continue scamming, with no real difference in essence.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 01-11 01:56

To be honest, this set of things is just a rehash with no real change; it's no different from the tricks of stablecoins—just robbing Peter to pay Paul. If you really want to make a splash, you need a complete overhaul. Do you think you can fool people just by putting a new coat of paint on it? Wake up. You might just be setting a trap for the next wave of collapse.

View OriginalReply0

BoredRiceBall

· 01-11 01:56

It's another shell game; changing the exterior is called innovation.

View OriginalReply0

DisillusiionOracle

· 01-11 01:44

Basically, it's just a different disguise with no fundamental change. Stablecoins have already taught us a lesson once; are tokenized stocks going to repeat the same mistake?

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBard

· 01-11 01:40

Basically, it's just a change of superficial appearance without addressing the core issue. Wrapping stocks in a token doesn't really solve the problem, does it?

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 01-11 01:35

Oh no, it's the same old trick with a new coat of paint. It really cracks me up. Lipstick on a pig, this guy nailed it. Tokenized stocks are just old wine in a new bottle. I'm just worried it will become the next stablecoin trap.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofster

· 01-11 01:35

nah tbh just slapping blockchain on legacy equity infrastructure is theater. technically speaking, we're not solving the representation problem—we're just xeroxing it. same fragility vectors, different skin.

Reply0