2026-01-10 21:24:41

After the social platform changed its algorithm, many people complained that the效果 became worse. But to be honest, I haven't noticed any明显变化 on my end.

The key still depends on what you post. Present truly valuable and insightful content, and no matter how the platform changes, it won't hurt you. Instead, those accounts relying on engagement farming and desperately chasing trending topics for traffic are starting to be exposed.

Quantity has never been the core; quality is. I quite support this round of algorithm adjustments, as it pulls the platform ecosystem back. Less mindless spamming, more genuine insights—only then can the community thrive in a healthier way.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

26 Likes

Reward
26
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SelfCustodyIssues

· 01-12 21:34

That's right, content quality is king. Trash accounts should have been filtered out long ago. Exactly, those accounts that jump on trending topics every day should cool off, so the ecosystem can thrive. Quality > Quantity, this logic is sound. Instead of blaming the algorithm, it's better to think about what you are producing—simple words but meaningful ideas. Agreed, fewer spam messages make the platform cleaner, but some people just can't accept that.

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 01-12 20:25

well *actually* if you look at the engagement metrics empirically, those people whining are just running weak content strategies. quality signal detection isn't rocket science, ser

Reply0

StableGenius

· 01-12 10:27

nah this tracks—empirically speaking, the ones complaining are prob just the engagement farmers anyway. quality content doesn't need algorithmic charity to survive, fundamentally flawed strategy if you relied on that 😂

Reply0

LightningLady

· 01-10 22:07

Ah, yes, yes, yes, that's the logic. Those accounts that jump on trending topics every day are now starting to cry. Quality will always beat traffic—that's a fact. I'm just wondering why so many people insist on running data farms. Isn't it exhausting? Finally, a platform dares to take real action. Incredible. Algorithm adjustments are like a big cleanup; the rule of survival of the fittest never goes out of style.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaMillionairen't

· 01-10 21:54

I fully agree, quality is the key Really, those accounts that jump on trending topics every day should cool down I am optimistic about this algorithm adjustment; the ability to filter out spam content has improved It was about time, the era of screen flooding is coming to an end Agreed, no matter how much poor content is optimized, it can't be saved

View OriginalReply0

Lonely_Validator

· 01-10 21:54

The algorithm has changed, but accounts riding the trend are indeed losing followers. I can see that clearly. Really, with more garbage content, the entire ecosystem just gets worse. Cleaning it up is actually a good thing. Accounts with valuable content don't fear these adjustments; in fact, it's an opportunity. To put it simply, it's a matter of strength. Accounts without a core will eventually be exposed.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 01-10 21:46

Content quality is indeed unstoppable; rough in words but sound in reasoning. --- I'm already tired of those accounts riding the trend; this wave of adjustment is basically a cleanup. --- That's right, but the worry is that ultimately the platform will still be controlled by traffic. --- The idea that quality is king has been heard many times; the key is that most people simply can't do it. --- Yes, it's normal for trash content to be suppressed; that's what a healthy ecosystem should look like. --- Only accounts that can survive this wave of algorithm changes are truly valuable; others are just bubbles. --- But on second thought, who defines quality? It's still the platform that has the final say. --- Support. Compared to those mindless spamming, it's more important that voices with ideas can be heard.

View OriginalReply0

airdrop_whisperer

· 01-10 21:38

The algorithm has changed, and spam accounts are starting to cry and call for their mothers, which is normal. Quality will never surpass quantity? It depends on how you understand it. Year after year, I've heard this phrase until I'm tired of it. Indeed, people with genuine content are not afraid of algorithm changes. You're right, but it sounds a bit idealistic, brother. I support the platform's effort to clean up spam, but ordinary people are also at risk of being sacrificed.

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 01-10 21:36

Honestly, the theory that content is king sounds very idealistic, but how many can truly persist in producing high-quality content? Accounts chasing trending topics should die, and accounts that are just filling space should be eliminated by the algorithm. No sympathy here. Changing the algorithm won't make much difference; the key is whether there are genuinely interested people in the community to chat. I support this round of adjustments; it all depends on how long they can stick with it. I love watching the collective collapse of spam accounts. A clean and healthy ecosystem is the way to go.

View OriginalReply0