2026-01-10 10:28:23

A leading AI chatbot platform has moved to tighten controls on its image generation capabilities, restricting access to premium members only. The shift came after concerns mounted over the tool's potential misuse in creating inappropriate visual content. The platform's approach reflects broader industry struggles with balancing innovation against content safety—a challenge that continues to shape how AI companies design their user policies and feature rollouts.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HashBard

· 01-13 09:50

ngl this is just the classic innovation vs safety theater play... they paywall the fun stuff and call it governance lmao

Reply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-13 08:13

Here we go again, only free guys get to read the text, huh --- Paywall under the guise of safety, really sneaky --- This move is just to force people to pay, don’t pretend to be so noble --- Afraid of being abused? It’s really just about making money --- A typical pattern of loosening first and tightening later; once you get used to it, you have to pay. The套路 is deep --- I just want to know who will pay for this... --- Always shouting about safety, but in reality, good stuff is locked behind paywalls --- Now it’s all good, creative freedom will be compromised --- Forget it, let’s use open-source solutions, it’s all the same套路 sooner or later --- Doing this, aren’t they just about to start harvesting

View OriginalReply0

ForkPrince

· 01-10 10:58

Here comes the money-grabbing again, under the guise of innovation, it's just a scam to collect funds.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiAlchemist

· 01-10 10:58

*adjusts alchemical instruments* ah, so they're transmuting free access into a paywall moat... the yield optimization of gatekeeping, classic. wonder what the real APY on content moderation actually is when you factor in legal liability? probably negative, hence the protocol shift toward premium liquidity providers only. the philosopher's stone of risk mitigation strikes again.

Reply0

PrivacyMaximalist

· 01-10 10:57

Good grief, it's another "for safety" price hike tactic. Free users are directly reduced to second-class citizens.

View OriginalReply0

ApyWhisperer

· 01-10 10:56

Paywall is back, but honestly, if it could really block those who mess around, I wouldn't mind. This is what Web3 should do—return power to users instead of locking it in centralized platforms. To be honest, the limited free image generation capability is a bit of a blow to free users, but content safety is indeed something that needs to be managed. It's the same old rhetoric, innovation vs. safety, and in the end, ordinary users are the ones who suffer. It feels like this kind of censorship is inevitable sooner or later. Instead of waiting to be criticized, it's better to take the initiative. Huh, in that case, wouldn't those paying big users do whatever they want? Double standards.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-10 10:49

Haha, back to harvesting the little guys again, free users are directly compromised --- Only paying users can use image generation? This move is really clever --- Talking about content safety, isn't it just about making money --- I just want to ask, why can safety issues only be solved by charging --- Now it's settled, the balance between innovation and safety is to open a paywall --- Closing image generation and opening up commercial mechanisms, it's truly a good deal --- Always talking about risk management, but I don't see any benefits for free users

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCryer