Tried running a full report through Claude Code to see what interesting patterns emerge in the dataset. Generated a bunch of charts from the results, but keeping it real—I haven't verified every single data point. The approach itself is pretty cool though: dump the raw data into an AI coding tool and let it surface whatever stands out. It's a good way to spot potential angles you might otherwise miss. Still, definitely worth treating the outputs as conversation starters rather than gospel truth. The real value is in the exploratory process and spotting what might be worth investigating deeper.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
4 Likes
Reward
4
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
airdrop_whisperer
· 15h ago
Haha, Claude Code as a data analyst is indeed interesting, but I've already tried this approach in the degen group. The charts look nice, but I've also been slapped in the face more than once when things didn't turn out as expected.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 01-09 18:08
This guy's idea is pretty good. Using AI to run data exploration is much smarter than blindly trusting the results.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSurfer
· 01-09 18:08
Hmm... Using AI to analyze data like this can indeed reveal some unexpected perspectives, but I still don't fully trust unverified charts; they feel a bit unreliable.
View OriginalReply0
ParallelChainMaxi
· 01-09 18:06
This idea is good, just be careful not to be fooled by AI's tricks.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 01-09 18:04
This idea is good, but you need to be cautious of AI hallucinations; don't really treat charts as the ultimate truth of the data.
View OriginalReply0
ApeEscapeArtist
· 01-09 18:04
Claude's data runs are indeed quite interesting, but you really need to treat the output as a discussion starter rather than the truth. I've done this before as well, and found that some patterns are actually just noise... you still have to verify it yourself.
View OriginalReply0
SurvivorshipBias
· 01-09 17:51
Using Claude to run data is indeed a good approach, but I have to give you credit for your honest attitude... Most people have already taken it as gospel.
Tried running a full report through Claude Code to see what interesting patterns emerge in the dataset. Generated a bunch of charts from the results, but keeping it real—I haven't verified every single data point. The approach itself is pretty cool though: dump the raw data into an AI coding tool and let it surface whatever stands out. It's a good way to spot potential angles you might otherwise miss. Still, definitely worth treating the outputs as conversation starters rather than gospel truth. The real value is in the exploratory process and spotting what might be worth investigating deeper.