Base processes over 10 million transactions per day, with users paying an average fee of only $0.01. If these transactions were executed on the Ethereum mainnet, the ETH fees would exceed $200 million. What is the cost? Transaction value has been transferred — a leading platform retains sequencer revenue, and the fee economy of the mainnet is bypassed. Arbitrum and Optimism are also copying this model. This is the paradox of L2 scaling: they indeed reduce user costs but alter the flow of value within the entire ecosystem. L2 should be Ethereum's scaling solution, but instead, it has become a channel that diverts economic value from the mainnet. This issue warrants serious consideration by the Web3 community.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
rekt_but_vibing
· 01-11 05:49
The sweet trap of L2... It's cheap, but the sequencer is secretly making a fortune, and the Fee burn on the mainnet is being drained. We users are enjoying it, but the Ethereum economy is being drained.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 01-10 12:45
Basically, it's just cheap for users and fattening the middlemen. This kind of "harvesting" trick has been played in Web3 for many years.
View OriginalReply0
CantAffordPancake
· 01-09 16:17
Wait, the sequencer revenue is being taken by the platform? So the cheap price we pay as users is for the mainnet to be drained... This deal feels a bit uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoy
· 01-09 14:53
Uh, something's not right. Who will compensate for the mainnet losses caused by the sequencer's gains... Isn't this just another way to harvest profits elsewhere?
View OriginalReply0
SillyWhale
· 01-09 14:53
This is a pretty ugly move—one platform takes all the sequencer fees, the mainnet gets sidelined, users benefit cheaply, but the ecosystem becomes fragmented.
View OriginalReply0
NervousFingers
· 01-09 14:50
In simple terms, the benefits are paid by the users, so it's cheap, but the money is all taken by the sequencer, and the mainnet miners are crying.
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezer
· 01-09 14:44
NFTs are really becoming more and more fragmented... Sequencer users are getting the benefits while the mainnet has nothing.
Base processes over 10 million transactions per day, with users paying an average fee of only $0.01. If these transactions were executed on the Ethereum mainnet, the ETH fees would exceed $200 million. What is the cost? Transaction value has been transferred — a leading platform retains sequencer revenue, and the fee economy of the mainnet is bypassed. Arbitrum and Optimism are also copying this model. This is the paradox of L2 scaling: they indeed reduce user costs but alter the flow of value within the entire ecosystem. L2 should be Ethereum's scaling solution, but instead, it has become a channel that diverts economic value from the mainnet. This issue warrants serious consideration by the Web3 community.