2026-01-09 13:25:42

The energy composition of Bitcoin mining has quietly undergone a dramatic change. The latest data shows that renewable energy accounts for over 56% of the electricity consumption in mining, a significant leap from 34% in 2021. Behind this is the green shift in the mining industry—from equipment recycling to waste heat energy conversion, and to the large-scale application of methane capture technology, the entire ecosystem is quantifying and maximizing its environmental benefits. This not only changes the external stereotypes of Bitcoin mining but more importantly, verifies the feasibility of the crypto industry evolving towards sustainable development.

BTC1,46%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LightningClicker

· 20h ago

No way, 56%? That number looks pretty good, but how accurate is it... The proportion of renewable energy has doubled, but we still need to ask how it's calculated. Green mining sounds good, but I doubt how much of the promotion is genuine. Finally, someone is taking this seriously, which is great. The utilization of waste heat definitely has potential, worth paying attention to in the future.

View OriginalReply0

NewDAOdreamer

· 01-11 13:50

I'm not an environmental guardian, but the 56% figure really slapped a lot of people in the face. Bitcoin miners are finally starting to use their brains, with methane capture and waste heat conversion... After this combination of measures, those who call BTC an energy monster need to settle down. From 34% in 2021 to 56% now, that's quite a rapid increase. We need to take a good look at how this was achieved behind the scenes. Green mining is not just a slogan; it's a real business with solid profits. That's the kind of thing I want to see.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBeggar

· 01-10 01:18

Wow, 56% renewable energy? This turnaround came a bit unexpectedly. The previous group of people said that mining destroys the Earth, but that wasn't entirely wrong... But now this data really is a slap in the face. Really? Methane capture can still be used, and miners are starting to pay attention? From 34% to 56%, in just these two years? That's a bit outrageous, the development speed is impressive. Wait, is this real data or just more hype... Green mining sounds good, but I don't know how long it can last.

View OriginalReply0

RektCoaster

· 01-09 13:55

Wow, 56%? This data is rising faster than my coins. Mining is really whitewashing, but I still think there's more hype than substance. Green mining sounds good, but electricity bills still burn money. Suddenly I wonder why not just use nuclear power directly? These miners finally did something respectable. Data can be misleading, but the key is where the money actually flows. Renewable energy is good, but I'm worried about selective statistics. Wait, can methane capture technology really be scaled up? That's a bit questionable. From 34 to 56, the speed of this change is indeed a bit surprising. Feels like they've been scolded enough and are starting to do marketing. As long as the profit is high enough, green can become a reality too.

View OriginalReply0

LayerHopper

· 01-09 13:42

Bro, is this data real? I find it hard to believe that 56% is true. There's something going on—mining is starting to go green too. Now the skeptics have nothing to say, haha. Methane capture? Sure, it's better than burning coal. Sounds good in theory, but how is it actually ensured in practice? A green transition sounds great, but I'm worried it's just on paper. Wait, is this data comparing globally or to certain regions? The details are crucial. That's great, finally someone has thoroughly understood this issue.

View OriginalReply0

JustHereForMemes

· 01-09 13:40

Whoa, 56%? Last year they were talking about energy waste, now they're eating their words haha Wait, is this data real... Large-scale methane capture? I haven't heard of that Green mining sounds good, but electricity costs are still sky-high Is it true, 56% renewable energy? Feels like there's some water in it I just want to know if miners are making more money, everything else is just虚的 This is what I want to see, breaking stereotypes depends on this Forget it, I'm here for the memes anyway, energy issues are too complicated Switching? I think it's more like being forced to switch, public opinion pressure is intense Honestly, I would believe it if Bitcoin dropped to 10,000

View OriginalReply0

ExpectationFarmer

· 01-09 13:36

Wow, 56%? If this data is true, I have to change my tune. I was a bit harsh on the mining community before. But I have some doubts about methane capture. Can it really be used on a large scale? Green mining still has some potential, but whether the market will buy it is hard to say. Wait, these two numbers are so different. How did they get through three years in between? The polite way to say it is a shift in focus; the less polite way is that they were criticized into changing... But changing is still progress, right? Do you think this can shut the environmentalists up?

View OriginalReply0