2026-01-09 01:30:08

NFTs: which format reigns supreme? The eternal debate continues—2D artworks versus 3D collectibles. Both have carved out their own territory in the Web3 space. 2D pieces offer simplicity and artistic purity, while 3D opens doors to immersive experiences and metaverse integration. What's your take? Does one truly outshine the other, or do they coexist in harmony?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

not_your_keys

· 01-10 17:43

To be honest, I really can't handle the pure art style of 2D work; I prefer the immersive experience of 3D stuff.

View OriginalReply0

AllTalkLongTrader

· 01-09 01:58

To be honest, the 3D set is now just hype around concepts; truly tasteful works still come from 2D pure art.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiAlchemist

· 01-09 01:56

nah tbh the real yield arbitrage is minting both formats simultaneously... the protocol efficiency metrics don't lie here, 3D just has better liquidity dynamics in secondary markets rn

Reply0

TopBuyerForever

· 01-09 01:53

ngl 3D sounds cool, but who actually uses it? It's still just above 2D.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatorFlash

· 01-09 01:36

In plain terms, the 3D setup is now just a liquidity trap, with higher collateralization requirements and an absurdly low liquidation risk threshold. 2D is actually more resistant to declines; the data shows—historical volatility difference of 37.5%.

View OriginalReply0