2026-01-09 01:28:10

【The Life and Death Difference in Settlement Speed】

A recent application for an Ethereum trust by Morgan Stanley marks the official entry of Wall Street financial giants into the crypto space. However, challenges follow — the traditional banking world's T+3 settlement cycle faces a compliance cost surge under the SEC's upcoming 2026 stablecoin regulations.

Why the urgency? Because once regulatory rules are implemented, compliance costs will skyrocket, and the outdated three-day settlement speed can no longer keep up with the pace of global capital flows. The recent cross-border capital crisis in Venezuela provides an answer: **When geopolitical risks emerge, whoever controls the rapid flow of funds gains the power to survive.**

【Compare the Pain Points】

Traditional cross-border payments have three major flaws:

⏰ **Waiting too long** — T+3 means you have to wait three days to access your funds
💸 **Exorbitant fees** — Multiple intermediaries easily push fees over 3%
🌐 **Too many restrictions** — Account matching, anti-money laundering checks... a host of barriers

What about crypto networks? T+0 settlement is no longer a dream. Some blockchain-based payment solutions are already doing similar — using on-chain decentralized custody (like third-party custody solutions such as BitGo) to ensure security while cutting out intermediaries. Data shows that this architecture can reduce compliance costs by about 60%.

【Numbers Speak】

The current reality is: traditional finance is trying to adapt to the crypto world, but the efficiency bottleneck of the old system is being pierced by new technology. T+0 is no longer an ideal state; it is a market-ready option.

What’s next? As stablecoin regulations are finalized, the competition in the cross-border payment market will shift from "slow and expensive" to "fast and cheap." Whoever can provide compliant instant settlement first will capture the next wave of user traffic.

ETH6,92%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-74b10196

· 01-10 22:22

The crisis in Venezuela really hit the nail on the head; in critical moments, we still have to rely on on-chain speed to save the day.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeJumper

· 01-10 18:08

Wait a minute, T+3 can still last until 2026? Traditional finance's old relics really should retire Morgan Stanley is in, just go ahead, but still dragging the bank's three-day baggage... Isn't this just waiting to die? What did the wave in Venezuela say again? The right to quick circulation is the true right to survive, that statement is brilliant

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSurvivor

· 01-09 12:42

Morgan Stanley is entering the market, but the key is who can be the first to achieve true T+0 trading; otherwise, it's all just talk.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainSniper

· 01-09 01:58

Really, the T+3 gameplay is dead. That wave in Venezuela directly proved what a critical point is. The bank folks are still dragging their feet; on-chain transactions have already been running T+0. Even with Morgan Stanley entering the scene, it can't change the settlement speed, and the costs are still high. With this new regulation on stablecoins coming down, traditional finance will be forced to upgrade. Those who can't keep up with the fast pace will become cannon fodder in the next cycle. Compliance costs cut by 60%? If this data truly materializes, the cross-border payment landscape will undergo a major reshuffle.

View OriginalReply0

BetterLuckyThanSmart

· 01-09 01:58

T+0 is really here, and traditional banks are still dragging their feet for three days Getting into crypto on Wall Street is basically a forced choice; if you don't keep up, you'll die The wave in Venezuela was indeed fierce; capital flow speed is everything Once the 2026 stablecoin regulations are implemented, compliance costs will skyrocket, but efficiency could actually decrease by 60%, how is that even possible haha Cross-border payments will now be a bloody battle; whoever is slow will be eliminated

View OriginalReply0

StakeTillRetire

· 01-09 01:54

Ha, T+3 is still stubbornly sticking around, now I really have to kneel Venezuela's situation is a real lesson, even a one-second delay means losing all the money Traditional finance is now both eager to enter and afraid of being wiped out, which is awkward T+0 is really here, who still uses your broken three-day system? Can compliance costs be cut by 60%? These claims are a bit exaggerated, will reality be this smooth? Waiting to see who will first reap this wave of benefits, if Morgan Stanley can really pull it off, it would be a game-changer Middlemen should be crying, this time they are truly about to be revolutionized By the way, are custodial solutions like BitGo really reliable? I always feel there are still risks

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-09 01:54

T+0 is really here, traditional banks are panicking this time --- Three-day settlement? I can sleep three times already haha --- That wave in Venezuela clearly showed that quick circulation rights mean power of discourse --- Cut compliance costs by 60%? I need to see the original data for this number --- Once SEC rules are implemented, cross-border payments will definitely be a red ocean --- Are custody solutions like BitGo reliable? It still feels like we need to observe --- Old finance wanting to be compatible with new technology is essentially being forced to evolve --- T+0 is no longer a dream; it’s already a question on the exam --- Breaking the 3% transaction fee threshold is really no big deal; some are even more outrageous --- Whoever masters real-time settlement in the next wave will win user minds

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinArbitrageur

· 01-09 01:43

actually hold up... the 60% compliance cost reduction claim needs more scrutiny. what's the denominator here? total operational spend or just settlement fees?

Reply0

YieldChaser

· 01-09 01:36

Morgan Stanley has entered the market, but can the old Wall Street methods really keep up with the on-chain rhythm? T+3 settlement is a joke in the face of crypto. --- Compliance costs are skyrocketing, and banks still insist on T+3. Aren't they just asking for self-destruction? --- That move in Venezuela directly exposed the truth: rapid fund circulation = life or death, while traditional finance is still dragging its feet. --- T+0 is really here, with a 60% cost reduction. Who still wants to wait three days? --- Honestly, this round of competition depends on who can integrate compliance and speed first. Once the stablecoin rules are finalized, the game truly begins. --- Wall Street giants are now forced to enter, but with such a rigid system, how can they compare to native blockchain solutions? --- The key is real-time settlement. Crypto has already achieved this, while banks are still arguing over compliance. That's where the gap lies. --- The crypto world has long been tired of T+0; traditional finance is only now catching on. It's a bit late.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 01-09 01:29

Morgan Stanley has to be forced to change once they come in; T+3 has no way out at all.

View OriginalReply0