Recently, there is a new project called FFAI, which puts an interesting idea into practice—using blockchain to turn electric vehicle orders into financial products.
The core logic is actually not complicated. Real electric vehicle orders worth 500 million USD are on-chain, with each delivery directly mapped to token value. This is indeed a new approach in the RWA (Real-World Asset) field: instead of virtual assets, physical delivery of real assets serves as the value anchor.
From a tokenomics perspective, FFAI's design has several features: 5% of tokens are burned with each vehicle transaction. This deflationary mechanism is more aggressive than traditional mining halving—burning tokens directly rather than reducing production. In theory, the larger the delivery volume, the faster the deflation, and the more scarce the tokens become.
Next is staking yield. An annualized return of 20%-50% sounds attractive, but the key is the source of the yield—not from new issuance or air tokens dividends, but from actual car sales profits. This is completely different from the virtual profit logic of many DeFi projects.
The DAO governance part is also worth noting. Voting determines the buyback ratio, or using FFAI to purchase cars for discounts, making tokens not just financial tools but also a kind of rights certificate within the ecosystem.
Of course, this model is not without risks. Whether RWA can truly be implemented, order fulfillment rates, and market acceptance—all need time to verify. But from an innovation perspective, combining real assets with on-chain governance is indeed a direction worth watching.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainSpy
· 01-12 01:26
Wait, can real orders directly generate revenue once they are on the blockchain? This logic feels a bit off.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCross-TalkClub
· 01-09 01:56
Laughing to death, it's another story of a "real order." I bet five bucks that next month I'll hear about a "supply chain problem."
Wait, 20%-50% annualized? That's more interest than I make from telling jokes. Don't the project founders feel guilty?
I've heard the concept of RWA so many times, but I'm just worried it's another scammer in disguise.
Real delivery? I want to know if this 500 million order is also on the chain and will be deflationary.
No hype, no blackening. If it really could sustain income by selling cars, it would have gone public long ago. Why bother in the crypto world to cut leeks?
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 01-09 01:54
500 million USD electric vehicle order on the blockchain? If that's true, it would be really interesting.
Vehicle delivery = token appreciation, definitely better than those pump-and-dump coins...
20%-50% annualized... Hopefully it's not just another new trick to scam retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 01-09 01:53
500 million orders on the blockchain? This isn't the kind of scam you're talking about, right?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 01-09 01:51
A 500 million electric vehicle order on the blockchain, is this really happening or just another round of retail investors being harvested?
But this deflation mechanism is indeed fierce, directly burning tokens, much more brutal than halving.
Wait, do the 20%-50% annualized returns really come from car profits? We need to ask whether these cars can be delivered on time.
I've heard many stories about RWA, but the key is implementation capability; talking on paper is easy for anyone.
DAO voting to buy back? Sounds democratic, but in the end, it's still the big players who call the shots.
I need to observe this thing for a while; I'm not in a rush to get in, the risks are too high.
Recently, there is a new project called FFAI, which puts an interesting idea into practice—using blockchain to turn electric vehicle orders into financial products.
The core logic is actually not complicated. Real electric vehicle orders worth 500 million USD are on-chain, with each delivery directly mapped to token value. This is indeed a new approach in the RWA (Real-World Asset) field: instead of virtual assets, physical delivery of real assets serves as the value anchor.
From a tokenomics perspective, FFAI's design has several features: 5% of tokens are burned with each vehicle transaction. This deflationary mechanism is more aggressive than traditional mining halving—burning tokens directly rather than reducing production. In theory, the larger the delivery volume, the faster the deflation, and the more scarce the tokens become.
Next is staking yield. An annualized return of 20%-50% sounds attractive, but the key is the source of the yield—not from new issuance or air tokens dividends, but from actual car sales profits. This is completely different from the virtual profit logic of many DeFi projects.
The DAO governance part is also worth noting. Voting determines the buyback ratio, or using FFAI to purchase cars for discounts, making tokens not just financial tools but also a kind of rights certificate within the ecosystem.
Of course, this model is not without risks. Whether RWA can truly be implemented, order fulfillment rates, and market acceptance—all need time to verify. But from an innovation perspective, combining real assets with on-chain governance is indeed a direction worth watching.