2026-01-09 01:22:02

Speaking of AI applications in vertical fields, the changes in the past two years have indeed been quite rapid. In the past, we often heard that China was always a step behind in cutting-edge AI, but in the "AI + Health" sector, the situation has reversed — domestic implementation has actually been ahead. What does this indicate? Global leaders in AI technology have also recognized the opportunity. After the official launch of ChatGPT Health, one point was emphasized: health consulting has become the most frequent AI application scenario for users, with over 230 million people worldwide asking health and fitness questions on ChatGPT every week. This number alone is quite telling — "AI + Health" is no longer a small niche; it is a major direction with global strategic value.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenWhisperer

· 01-11 21:39

The domestic scene has indeed become competitive, but honestly, with a population of 230 million, it sounds big, but it depends on how many actually see real implementation. --- AI + health is hot, but I'm just worried it will end up being just PPT dreams. What can it actually treat? --- Wait, is the domestic scene really faster than OpenAI? I’m a bit surprised. --- Basically, everyone sees the money, whoever launches first gets popular. But this time, the domestic scene definitely didn’t fall behind. --- 230 million people are asking about health issues... Are there really that many people trusting AI doctors? It seems quite risky. --- Reversal, reversal. This round of domestic imitation didn’t succeed, but instead, they got the questions right.

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_survivor

· 01-11 18:48

Really? We're actually leading in health AI, this turnaround is quite shocking. 230 million people ask about health every week, the data must be terrifying... By the way, I now ask AI instead of Google, it's a bit addictive. If AI + health can truly be implemented well, it could reduce a lot of medical expenses, and reliability is key. This track feels like the next gold mine; major companies must keep a close eye on it. The fast pace this time in China isn't just luck, the urgent need for medical care is right there. Returning to token economics, who will set the price for the data value of these AI applications? This points to one issue—people are always most concerned about their own health, no matter what technology is involved.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-0717ab66