The South Korean Supreme Court made an important ruling on December 11th last year — individuals' Bitcoin holdings in virtual asset exchange accounts such as Upbit and Bithumb can be legally seized under the Criminal Procedure Act.
This case began in January 2020. At that time, during a money laundering investigation, the police seized 55.6 Bitcoins from the suspect's exchange account. The question arose: can cryptocurrencies in virtual asset exchanges be treated as physical evidence in the traditional sense? The Supreme Court's answer was yes.
The court's reasoning is clear: although Bitcoin is an electronic token, it has economic value, can be managed independently, traded freely, and is subject to substantial control. According to legal logic, the objects of seizure include both tangible items and electronic information. Since Bitcoin meets these criteria, it naturally becomes a target for investigation agencies to seize.
This ruling is quite significant. It explicitly clarifies the legal status of cryptocurrencies stored in exchanges from a judicial perspective for the first time, laying a precedent for future virtual asset regulation, case investigations, and legislation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaNomad
· 01-11 13:50
The coins in the wallet are really going to be frozen, and now exchanges are no longer absolutely safe places...
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 01-11 05:49
Regulation is coming again. Does this mean exchange accounts are no longer considered your own?
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTop
· 01-09 01:51
Hmm... Can the coins in the exchange account also be seized? I need to be more careful now.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurDAOWatcher
· 01-09 01:51
Now the exchange's coins are no longer safe; I have to manage my own wallet.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 01-09 01:50
Oh no, the coins in the exchange are really unsafe now. I need to transfer them to a wallet quickly.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperer
· 01-09 01:34
Are your exchange's coins really safe... Now even the courts can seize them at will.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighbor
· 01-09 01:29
Wow, are the coins really going to be frozen now? The exchange account can still be deducted like this...
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperer
· 01-09 01:28
Wow, coins in the exchange can also be frozen? I really need to be more careful now.
View OriginalReply0
DevChive
· 01-09 01:23
Now the crypto world is really going to be heavily regulated, exchange accounts are no longer safe.
The South Korean Supreme Court made an important ruling on December 11th last year — individuals' Bitcoin holdings in virtual asset exchange accounts such as Upbit and Bithumb can be legally seized under the Criminal Procedure Act.
This case began in January 2020. At that time, during a money laundering investigation, the police seized 55.6 Bitcoins from the suspect's exchange account. The question arose: can cryptocurrencies in virtual asset exchanges be treated as physical evidence in the traditional sense? The Supreme Court's answer was yes.
The court's reasoning is clear: although Bitcoin is an electronic token, it has economic value, can be managed independently, traded freely, and is subject to substantial control. According to legal logic, the objects of seizure include both tangible items and electronic information. Since Bitcoin meets these criteria, it naturally becomes a target for investigation agencies to seize.
This ruling is quite significant. It explicitly clarifies the legal status of cryptocurrencies stored in exchanges from a judicial perspective for the first time, laying a precedent for future virtual asset regulation, case investigations, and legislation.