2026-01-09 00:37:41

Fully onchain trading products reaching the top four in such a short period is indeed impressive. Compared to similar products, the growth rate is quite remarkable.

However, there are also voices saying that this is just inflated trading volume driven by hype in the binary market. This argument also has some validity. Looking at trading volume numbers alone is indeed not very convincing. What truly matters is—what is the quality of these trading volumes? Is there genuine user activity supporting them? That is the key to judging how far an onchain product can go.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PensionDestroyer

· 01-10 21:20

Being in the top four is indeed impressive, but any product can boast about trading volume numbers. The key is whether real users stay or not; otherwise, all the impressive data is meaningless.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinTherapist

· 01-09 10:30

The top four are indeed impressive, but that trading volume... hmm, I need to dig into what's real and what's fake. --- Using the word "artificially inflated" is spot on. I also think it depends on the activity level to be meaningful. --- Is this another hype? Hold on, can the data really be faked? --- Quality > Quantity, that's the core; otherwise, it's just a paper tiger. --- Looks impressive, but where are the real users? That's the question. --- Being in the top four isn't hard; the hard part is whether you can last long enough. --- Haha, on-chain stuff is like this—first crazy rise, then collapse, cycle repeats. --- It depends on retention rate; otherwise, it's just a flash in the pan. --- The trading volume looks good on paper, but is this driven by actual demand or capital manipulation?

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainFoodie

· 01-09 01:07

ngl the volume numbers feel like overcooked soufflé rn... all air, no substance fr

Reply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 01-09 01:06

Everyone can boast about inflated numbers; the key is whether real users have stickiness.

View OriginalReply0

degenonymous

· 01-09 01:05

Numbers look good, but I'm afraid it's all just scammers hyping themselves up.

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocity

· 01-09 00:55

Exaggerated trading volume is a well-worn topic; those who truly survive still rely on genuine users.

View OriginalReply0

PositionPhobia

· 01-09 00:40

Top 4 rankings sound great, but when it comes to trading volume... honestly, it all comes down to whether real people are actually trading. I've seen inflated numbers way too many times.

View OriginalReply0

StakeHouseDirector