2026-01-09 00:31:54

An L2 that doesn't return fees to its applications isn't built for builders—it's just extracting value. Real developer-friendly networks align incentives by sharing economics with the teams building on them. That's how you grow a sustainable ecosystem.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainWatcher

· 4h ago

That's right. An L2 without profit sharing is just cutting developers' leeks. It's shameless to say they support ecosystem development. LOL

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Arbitrageur

· 23h ago

lmao the math checks out tho—if you're not getting fee-sharing, you're literally leaving basis points on the table every block. ngmi chains stay ngmi 💀

Reply0

ShitcoinConnoisseur

· 01-09 00:48

That's so true. Those L2 solutions that don't share profits are not really building an ecosystem; they're just harvesting profits. A true builder network should allow developers to also benefit from the rewards, so that talent can be retained.

View OriginalReply0

airdrop_huntress

· 01-09 00:45

That's right, those L2s don't even share fees, and they still have the nerve to call themselves developer-friendly? Laughable, they're just vampires with a different name.

View OriginalReply0

ApeDegen

· 01-09 00:43

Basically, it's just cutting leeks, right? They keep all the fees themselves and still have the audacity to call it L2? Truly powerful chains should share the revenue with developers; only then can the ecosystem truly come alive.

View OriginalReply0