At the end of each quarter, institutional operators engaged in real-world assets (RWA) or tokenized securities enter the same "nightmare" phase—compliance audit week. It's not about how badly the market is crashing, but how annoying regulatory inquiries are: AML (Anti-Money Laundering) checks, fund flow tracing, identity verification (KYC) matching...



Do you know what the traditional approach is? Scraping data on-chain and then manually matching off-chain identities. The entire team works overtime, and the error rate is still extremely high. This is the "manual compliance hell" that most exchanges and asset issuers are experiencing right now.

But I recently studied Dusk Network's asset issuance standards and suddenly realized there might be an alternative solution. Instead of treating compliance as a patch after the fact, Dusk Network uses the Zedger model and confidential secure contracts (XSC) to make it an inherent property of the asset itself. It sounds like a small difference, but in practice, it's a completely different world.

Let's start with the current pain points: the vast majority of RWA tokens on public chains are essentially "dumb." The standard ERC-20 contract is just a container with no logic inside. As long as you have the private key, you can transfer to anyone, including sanctioned addresses or frozen accounts—nothing the system can do about it.

Therefore, institutions have to layer a whitelist contract outside the token contract. It sounds simple, but in reality, it's a nightmare: every transfer must first check the whitelist, gas fees skyrocket, and the system becomes increasingly cumbersome...
DUSK-3,13%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseVagrantvip
· 01-10 11:21
Compliance audit week is indeed a grind, but I have to say, Dusk's approach is quite innovative. Incorporating compliance into the core logic of the asset itself saves a lot of messy manual work.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 01-09 00:57
Really, the end-of-quarter audit process is so depressing... the data layer is too chaotic. If this continues, gas fees will skyrocket to the moon. It would be great if compliance could be built directly into the protocol itself, avoiding the need for after-the-fact fixes. Why are people still using those "mute" contracts? It’s truly maddening.
View OriginalReply0
DefiOldTrickstervip
· 01-09 00:56
Ha, this is exactly what I want to see. The previous manual compliance work I’ve seen has caused too many teams to become overwhelmed and prone to errors. The idea behind Dusk is really clever—integrating compliance into the protocol itself, which makes things much easier.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 01-09 00:54
Haha, this is the real fundamental Web3 infrastructure that needs to be addressed, not just the trivial matter of trading coins. Making compliance a native property of smart contracts truly changes the game.
View OriginalReply0
EthMaximalistvip
· 01-09 00:52
Compliance auditing is indeed a pain point, but writing the logic into the smart contract isn't a silver bullet either; it still depends on how the implementation details are handled.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster69vip
· 01-09 00:46
Hey, that's why I've always said ERC-20 is just a decoration. Adding whitelist layers one after another can't save this broken system at all.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)