2026-01-09 00:26:46

Decentralized storage markets have always had a persistent problem—inefficient matching and transaction processes. Buyers and sellers need to repeatedly negotiate off-chain, incurring high costs and risks.

Walrus Protocol completely reverses this logic using Sui’s object model. They introduce a method called "Storage as Minting"—when a sufficient number of nodes confirm receipt of storage slices, a smart contract on the Sui chain automatically generates a storage object. The entire process is atomic: either the data is successfully stored and a receipt is generated, or the transaction fails and refunds are issued. There’s no gray area where "money is paid but data isn’t stored."

How important is this certainty? For financial products, it’s the foundation. Walrus transforms storage services from vague protocols into standardized, tokenizable assets. Transaction friction is greatly reduced, and storage resources can circulate on-chain like regular tokens at high speed. Tasks that once seemed difficult suddenly become simple.

Interestingly, this is not just a technical optimization but also a redefinition of the properties of storage commodities. Standardization plus tokenization is enough to break the original market structure.

SUI0,63%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCrying

· 01-12 00:26

Wors has truly outdone himself this time, finally solving the "Schrödinger's money" problem of storing transactions.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 01-12 00:16

No, this atomic design is really brilliant. Finally, someone has figured out how to master this storage pit. Sui's object model, I have to say, is much more powerful than the account model. Now, the transfer of stored assets is probably going to take off. The off-chain negotiation approach was long overdue.

View OriginalReply0

DeepRabbitHole

· 01-09 00:49

Atomic transactions are brilliant; finally, someone has filled the storage pit.

View OriginalReply0

PumpStrategist

· 01-09 00:45

Atomic transactions indeed block the gray area of off-chain negotiations, but I’m concerned—will the time cost of node confirmation become the new bottleneck? --- Tokenized storage sounds great, but the key is how long the liquidity can support it. Don’t let it turn into another death spiral of high premiums and low trading volume. --- The path of standardized assets has always been hyped up as a myth, only to find that it gets stuck on users’ real needs. --- Moving matching efficiency from off-chain to on-chain is essentially shifting friction, not eliminating it. It depends on whether the Sui network itself can handle this scale. --- Interesting, turning storage into tradable financial products, but the risk exposure also expands. Do these people have a plan to handle runs?

View OriginalReply0

OnchainHolmes

· 01-09 00:36

Atomicity is really impressive; finally, someone has completely eliminated the gray areas. In the area of storage tokenization and circulation, it feels like it could directly impact the Filecoin logic. The Sui object model is being used quite aggressively, but will adoption become a bottleneck... This standardization overhaul = a new monopoly opportunity? It depends on who can reap the benefits. Why didn't we think of the concept "storage as minting" earlier? The off-chain negotiation issues are finally coming to an end, lfg. The root cause of low matching efficiency, Walrus is a targeted solution.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalDetective

· 01-09 00:27

Wow, this is exactly what I've been wanting to see. Finally, someone has figured out the trash problem in the storage market.

View OriginalReply0