Florida is pushing forward with a major move—this is their third attempt to incorporate Bitcoin into the state’s financial reserves, and this time the plan is more direct: giving the governor direct control over the Bitcoin strategic reserve.
The previous two proposals were blocked by federal regulations, but Florida has apparently found a new breakthrough. If this passes, with the state government directly managing crypto assets, it would send a significant signal to the entire market—government-level trust endorsements often have a substantial impact on asset prices.
However, reality isn’t that simple. The power struggle between the Federal Reserve and state governments could ultimately render this proposal meaningless; historically, SEC actions have caused similar state-level initiatives to stall. Plus, considering Bitcoin’s inherent volatility, if a large-scale entry leads to a market downturn, the governor might face political costs in the next election.
Interestingly, if Florida succeeds, other states are likely to follow suit, potentially evolving into a political competition over crypto assets—but for ordinary investors, it’s also important to beware of blindly following the trend. Florida’s persistent "try again if unsuccessful" attitude is indeed noteworthy, but the market will never automatically rise just because of government involvement.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterWang
· 01-11 16:53
Third time's the charm, Florida is really persistent. We'll see if the Federal Reserve will give some face.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerGas
· 01-10 20:29
This is the third time... Will this truly break the deadlock or is it just another false hope? The Federal Reserve will definitely come out and stir things up, as history has proven.
View OriginalReply0
RebaseVictim
· 01-09 00:53
Florida, this is the third time haha. To be honest, I don't quite understand what they're so persistent about. The federal side has already blocked it twice...
View OriginalReply0
Degentleman
· 01-09 00:52
It's the third time already, Florida really won't give up... By the way, if this time really passes, other states will definitely follow suit, and then each state will be competing to stockpile coins. This scene is a bit interesting.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 01-09 00:43
It's the third time... How much does Florida want Bitcoin? Haha
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 01-09 00:41
This is the third time... Really? How persistent is Florida? But on the other hand, if it really passes, it’s quite impressive.
View OriginalReply0
GetRichLeek
· 01-09 00:36
This is the third time haha, Florida really doesn't give up... In my opinion, whether or not it passes is just good hype material; anyway, Bitcoin is mainly supported by these concepts. Last time I heard that a certain state was about to buy BTC and FOMOed in five thousand dollars, but... never mind, I won't mention it. But on the other hand, if the state government directly manages it, the distribution of chips would definitely change, and on-chain data would need to be analyzed.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMasked
· 01-09 00:27
Coming for the third time? Florida's obsession is really intense, it feels like a gambler's mentality... But on the other hand, if the governor were to directly control Bitcoin reserves, the SEC folks would probably come out and cause trouble again, as history has already proven.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8
· 01-09 00:25
This is the third time, Florida is really persistent... But if this actually happens, other states will definitely follow suit. Who knows then whether it's a good thing or a big trap?
Florida is pushing forward with a major move—this is their third attempt to incorporate Bitcoin into the state’s financial reserves, and this time the plan is more direct: giving the governor direct control over the Bitcoin strategic reserve.
The previous two proposals were blocked by federal regulations, but Florida has apparently found a new breakthrough. If this passes, with the state government directly managing crypto assets, it would send a significant signal to the entire market—government-level trust endorsements often have a substantial impact on asset prices.
However, reality isn’t that simple. The power struggle between the Federal Reserve and state governments could ultimately render this proposal meaningless; historically, SEC actions have caused similar state-level initiatives to stall. Plus, considering Bitcoin’s inherent volatility, if a large-scale entry leads to a market downturn, the governor might face political costs in the next election.
Interestingly, if Florida succeeds, other states are likely to follow suit, potentially evolving into a political competition over crypto assets—but for ordinary investors, it’s also important to beware of blindly following the trend. Florida’s persistent "try again if unsuccessful" attitude is indeed noteworthy, but the market will never automatically rise just because of government involvement.