In the era of explosive AI content, billions of pieces of information flood the sky every day, and it's hard to tell what's true and what's false. Those analysts and media figures who claim to be "neutral"? Basically, they make a living by talking.

The problem is, currently there is no mechanism to regulate their speech. You can freely make predictions, and if you're wrong, no one will hold you accountable; you can just change your stance and keep pretending. But the future will be different—trustworthy voices must dare to put their money where their mouth is.

Imagine this scenario: an analyst is bullish on a certain coin. They must publicly lock their tokens on the chain, with the amount, duration, and holdings all recorded on the blockchain, permanently verifiable. Supporting their positive outlook with real money votes. Wrong? That’s a real loss. Right? Both reputation and profits are gained.

In this way, credibility gains a new dimension—viewpoint + on-chain holdings + historical record. All three are indispensable. No matter how brilliant your opinion is, without corresponding on-chain actions to support it, it’s just armchair strategizing. And your entire track record is transparent and tamper-proof, making whitewashing impossible.

This is what the content ecosystem of the Web3 era should look like.