ZEC's performance yesterday was really heartbreaking—dropping from 480 to 422 in one go, a decline of over ten points that disappeared in an instant. The candlestick chart looks like it was hit hard with a punch, with the SUPERTRND's 418 support level nearly touched, trading volume spiking to 2.5 billion, a classic sign of panic selling.

The large red candle on the daily chart directly wiped out the gains from the previous three days, and the MACD indicator's green bars almost broke the scale. It feels like buying something that hasn't even arrived yet and then breaking down—frustrating to watch. But from another perspective? Maybe picking it up now could actually be useful.

What is the direct cause of market panic? The ECC development team announced yesterday that they are collectively resigning, citing irreconcilable differences with the governance layer in terms of philosophy. The team turned against each other, and investors would be crazy to stay calm. Last week, I placed an order at a high of 500, and now I’m directly trapped. This feeling is exactly the same as when LUNA collapsed completely back then—I really want to slap myself.

What’s even more nerve-wracking is that a whale just transferred 70,000 ZEC to a major exchange, clearly intending to dump. But think about it differently: this is a leader in the privacy coin field, which even hit 775 at the end of last year. Now, at this price? It’s like clearance sale items in a convenience store nearing expiration—50% off. Maybe drinking it might even feel pretty good?

I’ve decided to go long at 420. You might think I’ve lost my mind, but history has a way of speaking. Remember the DOGE internal conflict in 2021? I entered when it dropped 15 points, and three days later, it rose 30 points. When you catch a falling knife, the key is to catch it at the right position.

My strategy is clear: buy in at 420 now, betting on a rebound to 450. Set the stop-loss at 410—if it loses 10 points, accept defeat and exit. Instead of following panic selling blindly, it’s better to operate strategically in the opposite direction.

There’s one more detail worth mentioning—the fundamental tech of this project hasn’t collapsed; it’s just that the development team changed. It’s like a restaurant changing owners; the taste of the dishes remains the same, but no one dares to enter temporarily. Once the storm passes, funds that truly believe in the fundamentals will naturally come back.

Have you ever encountered a similar situation? When the project team changes and large funds exit simultaneously, do you choose to follow the trend and run, or wait and watch the show? Moments like these often hide opportunities—it's all about whether you dare to take action.