2026-01-08 23:26:57

The Layer1 track is already crowded, but by 2026, Helios has demonstrated a different approach.

Most other public chains focus on stacking speed and cost optimization, while Helios truly addresses the fragmentation problem of cross-chain ecosystems. Its native ETF architecture design makes things much simpler—users no longer need to manually rebalance across 5 different bridges, which is a real pain point for active traders.

From a technical perspective, this design approach is indeed differentiated and may find its place in the crowded L1 competition.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainBouncer

· 17h ago

Cross-chain rebalancing is indeed troublesome, but whether Helios's architecture can be implemented depends on future execution capability.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 22h ago

The pain point of cross-chain rebalancing really hits the mark, but actually implementing and using the ETF structure in practice is a whole different story.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-08 23:57

Cross-chain rebalancing is indeed a pain point, but can the native ETF architecture really solve it? It still depends on how it is used in real-world scenarios.

View OriginalReply0

SilentObserver

· 01-08 23:46

The pain points of cross-chain asset rebalancing are spot on. Having to jump back and forth between bridges every time is really annoying. If Helios can truly solve this issue, it definitely has something special.

View OriginalReply0

FudVaccinator

· 01-08 23:45

Cross-chain rebalancing is indeed a hassle, but to be honest, can Helios survive until 2026?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHermit

· 01-08 23:42

Cross-chain rebalancing is indeed a pain point, but can Helios survive past next year? --- The native ETF architecture sounds good, but I’m not sure how the actual liquidity will perform. --- Another project solving fragmentation... There are too many of these projects, how long can their differentiation last? --- Active traders need this, but is the ecosystem deep enough? Or is it just a tool layer? --- Speed and cost are now everywhere, but from a different perspective, it’s indeed refreshing. --- The question is whether users will actually migrate over; path dependency is too strong. --- This approach is fine, but how does it compare to Cosmos and Polkadot? Is it just another old story? --- The issue of manually rebalancing via five bridges has been criticized thousands of times. Is someone finally addressing it directly? --- Looks good, but the key is whether TVL can increase. --- Differentiation is one thing, but whether trading pairs are aligned is the real life-or-death line.

View OriginalReply0