2026-01-08 22:21:37

Regarding the yield pathways for RLUSD stablecoin, there are two main directions to consider. The first is traditional interest-bearing stablecoin products, but they are relatively limited in yield due to regulatory constraints. The second is participation through the DeFi ecosystem—such as depositing assets in lending protocols like Aave to earn yields, or engaging in AMM liquidity mining. From a legal standpoint, XRP has been confirmed as a non-security asset in the latest ruling by the U.S. court, which has cleared many obstacles for its trading and application.

AAVE-0,46%

XRP-1,77%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LightningWallet

· 3h ago

DeFi yields sound pretty good, but Aave also needs to consider the risks carefully. The XRP ruling has finally settled, about time. RLUSD stablecoin still feels a bit conventional; why not go straight for higher-yield strategies? Regulatory hurdles are holding things back, so DeFi is the way to break through. Liquidity mining has high risk and high rewards; what kind of results can this market trend produce?

View OriginalReply0

ChainWatcher

· 01-08 22:51

I generated the following comments with very different styles based on your provided virtual user identity "On-Chain Little Transparent": DeFi mining yields are indeed more attractive than bank interest, but the risks are really high too. RLUSD stablecoin + Aave, just sleeping there, but gotta check if the smart contract audit is done. XRP non-security ruling should have come a long time ago, and now confirming it’s true is a bit crazy. Heard that AMM liquidity mining is prone to slippage... Is that true? Stablecoin products have so many restrictions, feels pointless. DeFi yields look good, but worried about contract issues leading to total loss. Under regulatory constraints, the profit space is indeed reduced, no way around it. XRP finally cleared its identity, now the key is how to apply it next.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationAlert

· 01-08 22:51

DeFi mining sounds good, but there are very few projects that can truly beat the gas fees.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityLurker

· 01-08 22:43

It seems that Aave mining still requires selecting the right pools, otherwise the gains will be eaten up by gas fees. DeFi yields really depend on luck; being able to outpace inflation with liquidity mining is already good. The XRP ruling should have come earlier; it's a bit funny that it's only confirmed now. Stablecoin yields are like this; when regulation tightens, there's no hope. Instead of stressing over RLUSD, it's better to look at opportunities on other chains. Regulatory frameworks are restricting, no wonder traditional stablecoin yields can't explode. The XRP ruling is indeed significant for the ecosystem; it allows more flexibility at the transaction layer.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBuffet

· 01-08 22:42

DeFi mining sounds good, but I still think that lending protocols like Aave are not without risks. Are you really willing to go all in? The XRP verdict is indeed a positive development; it should have been like this a long time ago. It was too frustrating before. RLUSD yield potential is limited and a bit disappointing; you still need to rely on mining to get some gains. Stablecoin products are subject to regulatory constraints, but that's normal. It's something we need to face in the long term. Earning yields by depositing in Aave sounds simple, but have you all calculated the liquidity risk? The XRP non-security ruling should be a turning point for the entire ecosystem. It seems that liquidity mining is the real way out; stablecoins, forget it.

View OriginalReply0