The real question isn't whether there was deliberate collusion behind the scenes. What actually matters is the market structure itself—that's where the action happens.
Institutions? They know the game. They understand the rules, they read the timeline, they move accordingly.
Meanwhile, retail traders are left navigating all the uncertainty and absorbing whatever volatility comes their way. That's the actual story. The system works exactly as designed—and it's not designed equally for everyone.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TooScaredToSell
· 01-09 20:30
Basically, it's a systemic issue, not a conspiracy theory.
Institutional players will always have an advantage over retail investors, so there's nothing surprising about that.
View OriginalReply0
RooftopVIP
· 01-08 22:10
Basically, retail investors are just the chopped chives, and the system is designed this way.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalDetective
· 01-08 22:02
The game rules are inherently unfriendly to retail investors, and no one talks about systemic suppression at all.
View OriginalReply0
FreeRider
· 01-08 22:00
Basically, the rules were never meant for retail investors.
The real question isn't whether there was deliberate collusion behind the scenes. What actually matters is the market structure itself—that's where the action happens.
Institutions? They know the game. They understand the rules, they read the timeline, they move accordingly.
Meanwhile, retail traders are left navigating all the uncertainty and absorbing whatever volatility comes their way. That's the actual story. The system works exactly as designed—and it's not designed equally for everyone.