The founder of a major prediction markets platform just threw their weight behind a brewing US legislative effort to clamp down on insider trading within these emerging markets. Their take? The compliance measures aren't revolutionary—they're already standard practice on their platform.



This signals an interesting dynamic: as prediction markets gain traction and regulatory scrutiny increases, platforms are positioning themselves as responsible players. The proposed bill targets a real concern—whether early information leaks could create unfair advantages in markets where participants trade on event outcomes.

What's notable here is the framing. Rather than resisting regulation, the platform chief is essentially saying "we've got this covered." It's a smart move politically, but it also reflects how the prediction market space is evolving. These platforms are moving beyond the wild-west image and embracing governance structures that align with traditional financial oversight.

The bigger picture? As the US Congress considers tighter rules around prediction markets, having industry players openly support insider trading prohibitions actually strengthens the sector's credibility. It demonstrates that you can build transparent, trustworthy markets without compromising on innovation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenSleuthvip
· 5h ago
Haha, this is the typical "I'll regulate myself first" tactic, making me look especially clever.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDayvip
· 01-10 00:29
Haha, I see through this tactic. Supporting regulation proactively makes oneself appear clean.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetectivevip
· 01-09 16:16
Wait, "already standard practice"? I haven't seen these data flows on the chain... This explanation sounds a bit too smooth. I need to carefully check this founder's recent large transfer records.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuruvip
· 01-08 20:58
I've seen this trick before—supporting regulation proactively, as if putting on an "I'm a good guy" armor... Clever. But true insiders are hard to guard against. No matter how beautifully the rules are written, they can't stop malicious insiders from cheating, right? These people are just trying to profit from information asymmetry in prediction markets. Now they talk about transparency and compliance—I'm a bit skeptical... Wait, they say they've already started doing that? What about before? How was it before?
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTradervip
· 01-08 20:48
It should have been like this a long time ago. I can't understand why we didn't take the initiative to do this before.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStrikervip
· 01-08 20:44
Basically, it's still using regulation as a shield—claiming to be compliant while continuing to do whatever they want.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 01-08 20:44
Coming back with this set again? Compliance as innovation...
View OriginalReply0
TestnetScholarvip
· 01-08 20:37
Well, this move is quite interesting. To put it simply, it's about preemptively self-regulating to seize the narrative power—smart business strategy. --- Being compliant has long been an advantage; I see through this trick, it's clever. --- Wait, are they really doing well or just putting on a facade? We'll have to see what happens next. --- It's heating up. Supporting regulation early on is essentially a covert way to suppress competitors, with all the details in place. --- Will prediction markets really become the next regulated asset class? It feels like it's not far off. --- Sounds good, whether to cut the leeks or not, the key is who can get the license first.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)