2026-01-08 20:23:22

SUI Group's latest position snapshot shows they're now sitting on 108.1M $SUI tokens valued around $196M as of early January 2026. What's worth noting is their aggressive buyback strategy—they've already deployed $15.75M to repurchase 7.8M shares. This kind of institutional accumulation during market volatility typically signals confidence in the ecosystem's long-term potential. The scale of their holdings and continued capital commitment suggests they're positioning for sustained growth in the SUI network.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

just_vibin_onchain

· 01-08 20:43

Institutions are pouring money into buying, buying, buying. This is sending us a signal.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekNewSickle

· 01-08 20:36

Hmm... spending 15.75 million to buy back chips, sounds nice, but it's just a typical pre-rally move. --- So now the project team is stockpiling and talking about long-term potential. I've seen this script too many times. --- Wait, a 196M valuation and still throwing money? They have to force a rally. --- I'm exhausted. I've heard this kind of institutional confidence speech so many times it’s making my ears callous. Let's just see when they start selling. --- The word buyback sounds good, but in reality, it's just eating chips at the low point. I understand. --- With such a large amount of capital, retail investors should prepare mentally for a potential cut-loss.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 01-08 20:33

Over 100 million SUI tokens are being dumped, and the key lies in the incentive compatibility of the buyback mechanism—are they truly voting with real money for the governance model? The buyback strategy sounds attractive, but let's be clear: Is this institutional-level concentration of chips betting on the ecosystem or market making? There are too many lessons from history. Honestly, a buyback of 157 million is significant, but what about transparency? Where is the governance oversight of fund flows? If such a large holding lacks a supporting system of checks and balances, beware of becoming the next failure case. On the surface, the numbers look impressive, but I want to know what proportion of governance voting power they hold in SUI.

View OriginalReply0