Initial caching setup carries some overhead, but the payoff shows up where it counts. When you run this against production contracts like USDT and WBNB, the numbers tell the story—MIR-based execution consistently outpaces traditional stack interpretation by 8 to 27 percent. That's not marginal; it's the kind of efficiency gain that compounds across high-volume trading and complex smart contract interactions.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlindBoxVictimvip
· 22h ago
An efficiency improvement of 8 to 27% is indeed significant, but is the initial caching overhead really worth it?
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnonvip
· 01-09 10:39
An increase of 8 to 27 points sounds good, but can it really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
SelfRuggervip
· 01-08 18:59
8 to 27 percentage points? That's quite a significant number. The fact that both USDT and WBNB can achieve this kind of result definitely shows something.
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeekvip
· 01-08 18:51
Wow, an 8 to 27% increase? If this is truly verified on the mainnet, even large accounts like USDT and WBNB contracts can enjoy the benefits... That’s definitely not a figure to take lightly.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhalevip
· 01-08 18:34
Hmm... An 8-27% performance improvement is indeed impressive, but is it worth spending this much on initial caching costs?
View OriginalReply0
SquidTeachervip
· 01-08 18:30
An increase of 8 to 27%? That's incredible. Is it really that impressive?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)