Strengthening anti-cheat mechanisms while properly rewriting XP attribution—this dual approach deserves attention in the community. The key insight here is that tightening cheater detection doesn't have to mean reducing engagement or making the system less enjoyable. When you pair robust fraud prevention with fair reward distribution, both sides reinforce each other: integrity stays intact, and legitimate participants get what they actually earned. It's a solid reminder that technical safeguards and economic design can work hand in hand rather than pulling in opposite directions.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SelfRuggervip
· 01-07 17:59
Anti-cheat and fair distribution can work together; this approach is indeed excellent and much more conscientious than projects that simply restrict users.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationTherapistvip
· 01-07 17:55
You're right, anti-cheat and fair distribution are not actually opposed; when combined well, they can achieve 1+1>2. I'm already tired of those projects that make the entire system extremely complicated to prevent cheating, causing participation to drop straight down...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 01-07 17:55
ngl, this is the correct approach. Anti-cheat and fair distribution should go hand in hand.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHomelessvip
· 01-07 17:41
Anti-cheat measures and XP redistribution must be properly balanced; otherwise, the normal players will end up losing in the end.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt